Deadline Breached, But Trump Administration Aligns With U.S.-Based Proposal For Sherritt International Corporation. Third-Largest Certified Claimant Satisfied In Win For The White House.

TORONTO – Sherritt International Corporation (“Sherritt” or the “Corporation”) (TSX:S) today announced that it has received a specific license (the “Fuel License”) from the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) authorizing the purchase and delivery of fuel, fuel oil, and sulfur to Sherritt’s Moa Nickel mining and processing operations in Cuba (“Moa Nickel”), which form part of the Moa Joint Venture (“Moa JV”). The Fuel License is the first of a series of OFAC emergency licenses that will be necessary for Sherritt to be able to restart mining and processing operations at Moa Nickel as well as further processing and refining operations in Canada.

The Fuel License authorizes the sale, transportation, export, delivery and payment for fuel, fuel oil, and sulfur to Moa Nickel, together with all related services. The authorization extends to the Corporation’s licensed fuel supplier and persons acting on their behalf (including banks and vessel operators), as well as other necessary insurance or ancillary service providers (the “Covered Participants”). The Corporation prepared and submitted its requests for the OFAC emergency licenses in close coordination with Gillon Capital, LLC (“Gillon Capital”) in connection with Gillon Capital’s potential acquisition of a controlling interest in the Corporation, as contemplated by the non-binding term sheet between Gillon Capital and the Corporation dated May 19, 2026. OFAC issued the Fuel License while Gillon Capital and Sherritt apply to OFAC for consideration of a broader proposed transaction pursuant to which a U.S.-based investment fund would acquire a controlling interest in Sherritt. The Fuel License is the first of a series of licenses that would be necessary for Gillon Capital to acquire a controlling interest in Sherritt.

In connection with the Fuel License, Sherritt has entered into an interim consent agreement dated as of September 23, 2026 (the “Agreement”) with Moa Bay Mining Co. (“Moa Bay”), the holder of a certified claim relating to Moa Nickel under Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 (the “Helms-Burton Act”). Under the Agreement, Moa Bay has consented to interim fuel shipments to Moa Nickel in exchange for consent fees payable by or on behalf of Sherritt. As part of the Agreement, Moa Bay has also agreed not to bring any Helms-Burton Act claims against the Covered Participants in connection with those authorized shipments. Sherritt and Moa Bay have also obtained, concurrently with the Fuel License, separate OFAC authorization required for performance under the Agreement.

As previously disclosed, following the U.S. administration’s issuance of Executive Order 14404 expanding sanctions against persons and companies conducting business in Cuba, the Corporation suspended its direct participation in joint venture activities in Cuba on May 7, 2026 and ceased metals refining operations at its Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta facility on June 22, 2026. While the Fuel License and related fuel shipment are expected to allow Moa Nickel to meet essential fuel requirements and prepare for a restart, the actual restart of operations at Moa Nickel remains subject to receipt of a second OFAC emergency license, which the Corporation is working to obtain with the continued support of and in close coordination with Gillon Capital.

As previously disclosed, the Corporation continues to operate under constrained liquidity conditions and faces a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on its ability to continue as a going concern. The Corporation’s ability to satisfy obligations to suppliers, service providers and other stakeholders remains dependent on obtaining additional financing and implementing a broader recapitalization transaction, which the Corporation is actively pursuing. The Corporation remains in active discussions with its lenders and potential government and other strategic capital sources, including Gillon Capital. There can be no assurance that any such financing or transaction will be available or completed on acceptable terms, in a timely manner, or at all. See the “Liquidity” and “Capital Resources” sections of the Corporation’s management’s discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 for additional details regarding the Corporation’s Credit Facility, liquidity position and cash flows.

The Corporation is in the process of finalizing the initial fuel shipment, which is expected to ship in Q4 2026. Sherritt will continue to provide timely public disclosure as circumstances develop.

About Sherritt

Sherritt is a world leader in using hydrometallurgical processes to mine and refine nickel and cobalt – metals deemed critical for the energy transition. Leveraging its technical expertise and decades of experience in critical minerals processing, Sherritt is committed to expanding domestic refining capacity and reducing reliance on foreign sources. The Corporation operates a strategically important refinery in Alberta, Canada, recognized as the only significant cobalt refinery and one of just three nickel refineries in North America.  Sherritt’s common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “S”.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements and other information included in this press release may constitute “forward -looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “forward-looking statements”) under applicable securities laws (such statements are often accompanied by words such as “anticipate”, “forecast”, “expect”, “believe”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “estimate”, “intend” or other similar words).

All statements in this press release, other than those relating to historical information, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this press release include, without limitation, statements regarding: the expected timing and completion of the initial fuel shipment or any subsequent fuel shipment to Moa Nickel; the proposed transaction with Gillon Capital; the restart of operations at Moa Nickel; the continued effectiveness and sufficiency of the Fuel License and other required approvals; the Corporation’s ability to obtain the second OFAC emergency license required to restart operations at Moa Nickel and any other required OFAC authorizations, including in connection with any proposed financing or other transaction, the timing thereof, and the continued support of Gillon Capital in connection therewith; the participation of the Corporation’s fuel suppliers and other necessary service providers, including the Covered Participants, in the authorized activities; the continued operation and effect of the Agreement; the Corporation’s ability to continue as a going concern; and the Corporation’s ability to advance or complete a comprehensive recapitalization or other transaction.

The Corporation cautions readers of this press release not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement as a number of factors could cause actual future results, conditions, actions or events to differ materially from the targets, expectations, estimates or intentions expressed in the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation, continued risks related to Sherritt’s operations in Cuba and future actions taken by the U.S. government toward Cuba, including with respect to the U.S. administration’s May 1, 2026 Executive Order expanding sanctions against Cuba; level of liquidity of Sherritt, including access to capital and financing; the Corporation’s ability to negotiate and finalize a definitive agreement in respect of a recapitalization transaction, including the completion and timing thereof, the terms on which it may be completed and the receipt of all required approvals; the Corporation’s ability to restart its business and restore normal operations, including the ability to obtain restart financing; the risk to or loss of Sherritt’s entitlements to future distributions (including pursuant to the Cobalt Swap) from the Moa JV; the inability of the Corporation to comply with debt restrictions and covenants; the inability of the Corporation to comply with the listing requirements of the Toronto Stock Exchange or another recognized stock exchange; uncertainty in the ability of the Corporation to enforce legal rights in foreign jurisdictions; uncertainty regarding the interpretation and/or application of the applicable laws in foreign jurisdictions; tax risks; political, economic and other risks of foreign operations; security market fluctuations and price volatility; risks related to environmental liabilities including liability for reclamation costs, tailings facility failures and toxic gas releases; compliance with applicable environment, health and safety legislation and other associated matters; risks associated with governmental regulations regarding climate change and greenhouse gas emissions; risks relating to community relations; maintaining social license to grow and operate; risks associated with the operation of large projects generally; the ability to replace depleted mineral reserves; risks associated with the Corporation’s joint venture partners; risks associated with mining, processing and refining activities; reliance on key personnel and skilled workers; risks related to the Corporation’s corporate structure; foreign exchange and pricing risks; credit risks; future market access; interest rate changes; risks in obtaining insurance; uncertainties in labour relations; legal contingencies; risks related to the Corporation’s accounting policies; uncertainty in the ability of the Corporation to obtain government permits; failure to comply with, or changes to, applicable government regulations. The key risks and uncertainties should be considered in conjunction with the risk factors described in the Corporation’s other documents filed with the Canadian securities authorities, including without limitation the “Managing Risk” section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, the “Managing Risk” section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the three months and year ended December 31, 2025 and the Annual Information Form of the Corporation dated March 23, 2026 for the period ending December 31, 2025, each of which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. The forward-looking information and statements contained in this press release are made as of the date hereof and the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any oral or written forward-looking information or statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable securities laws. The forward-looking information and statements contained herein are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.  View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20261019542252/en/

Link To Related Analysis: Why Did President Trump Say No To U.S. Acquisition Of Sherritt International Corporation? Why Did Momentum Stall In Providing BIS, DOD, OFAC, OLA Licenses And Authorizations? Now What? October 15, 2026  

Why Did President Trump Say No To U.S. Acquisition Of Sherritt International Corporation? Why Did Momentum Stall In Providing BIS, DOD, OFAC, OLA Licenses And Authorizations? Now What?  

And Now There Is One… And Possibly None 

Why Did Trump-Vance Administration Momentum Stall In Providing BIS, DOD, OFAC, OLA Acquisition Licenses And Authorizations?  

From 3 January 2026, the Trump-Vance Administration (2025-2029) has crafted and implemented strategies designed to alter the status quo in the Republic of Cuba for non-Republic of Cuba-based companies. 

Donald Trump, President of the United States (2017-2021 and 2025-2029) is a self-proclaimed deal-maker-in-chief.   

Surprising then his team prevents him from authorizing what would be the largest United States-Republic of Cuba commercial deal in sixty-seven years?  And, inducing a settlement for assets of United States-based companies expropriated by the government of the Republic of Cuba- an accountability his twelve predecessors left unresolved.  Why did The White House not take yes for an answer and put a win in the win column?  

An effort by a United States-based investor connected politically to the Republican Party, Trump-Pence Administration (2017-2021), and Trump-Vance Administration to acquire Toronto, Canada-based Sherritt International Corporation (2025 revenue approximately US$389 million) expired on 12 October 2026.   

Sherritt International Corporation has cobalt, nickel, and energy (30% interest in Energas S.A.) operations in the Republic of Cuba. 

Sherritt International Corporation connectivity with the Republic of Cuba has been interrupted due to inclusions of related entities in the Specially Designated National (SDN) And Blocked Persons List by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury.   

Thus far this week, there is no statement from Mr. Ray Washburne of Dallas, Texas-based Gillon Capital LLC.  There is no statement from Sherritt International Corporation.  There is no statement from London, United Kingdom-based Kyma Capital Ltd. (approximately US$440 million assets under management) which leads a consortium interested in acquiring Sherritt International Corporation.  There is no statement from the government of Canada.  There is no statement from the government of the Republic of Cuba.  There is no statement from the Trump-Vance Administration which months ago informed Gillon Capital LLC and Kyma Capital Ltd. that Washington DC did not object to discussions about acquiring Sherritt International Corporation- but, no specific authorization was required for discussions, only for a transaction. 

For a transaction to be completed, The White House will need to direct the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) of the United States Department of Commerce; OFAC; United States Foreign Claims Settlement Commission (USFCSC) of the United States Department of Justice; and Office of the Legal Adviser (OLA) of the United States Department of State, to issue guidance, certify, issue licenses, and probably report sufficient changes within the Republic of Cuba which provide the Executive Branch with authorities to alter provisions of United States statutes.  

The decisions will require attention to and reframing of provisions within Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) of 1917; International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977; Cuban Democracy Act (CDA) of 1994; Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act (Libertad Act) of 1996; and Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act (TSREEA) of 2000.  

The decisions and reframing were expected to be challenging for some to digest.  The White House was expected to frame its decisions in part as patriotic and supporting entirely both the “Donroe Doctrine” which is the President Trump Corollary to the 1823 [James] Monroe Doctrine and “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) agenda and ethos, particularly the control and sourcing of critical minerals.   

The acquisition of Sherritt International Corporation including an individual (company) subject to United States jurisdiction, which is the case with both Gillon Capital LLC and Kyma Capital Ltd, would provide the Trump-Vance Administration an opportunity to simultaneously hold accountable the government of the Republic of Cuba for expropriation of an asset owned by a United States-based company and secure a settlement of the third-largest and perhaps partial settlement of the largest of the 5,913 claims certified by the USFCSC and make available for import to the United States additional supplies of cobalt and nickel.  

  • CU-2619: MOA Bay Mining Company, Improved Real Property, Oriente, Republic of Cuba, US$88,349,000.00. Link To Claim Filing In PDF Format  

  • CUBAN ELECTRIC COMPANY A/K/A COMPAÑIA CUBANA DE ELECTRICIDAD, Plaintiff, v. UNIÓN ELÉCTRICA AND ENERGAS S.A., Defendants. (1:26-cv-02675-JDB).  Link To Complaint 

The Trump-Vance Administration was reportedly nearing a series of policy and regulatory decisions to demonstrably alter and impact the commercial, economic, financial, military, political, and societal landscape of the Republic of Cuba and create, define, and redefine how the United States private sector re-engages within the Republic of Cuba.  Until it wasn’t. 

  • For direction and reference, posit how the Trump-Vance Administration has intertwined public sector interests and private sector interests including in the Republic of Armenia, Republic of Azerbaijan, Russian Federation, Syrian Arab Republic, and Ukraine. 

  • For direction and reference, posit how the Trump-Vance Administration has intertwined public sector interests and private sector interests in United States-based companies including Intel Corporation, L3 Harris, Lithium Americas, MP Materials, Trilogy Metals, USA Rare Earth, U.S. Steel, Vulcan Elements, Westinghouse, and Xlight. 

Now, Sherritt International Corporation may seek protections afforded by the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), which is the government of Canada equivalent to the reorganization provisions in Chapter Eleven of the United States Bankruptcy Code. 

Next to watch is what the consortium consisting of Kyma Capital Ltd.; London, United Kingdom-based Trifon Natsis (a partner in Jersey (Channel Islands), Crown Dependency-based Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP (2026 assets under management approximately US$31 billion)); Baar, Switzerland-based Glencore International AG (2025 revenue approximately US$247.5 billion); and an unidentified United States-based party.  Kyma Capital Ltd. owns approximately 13.43% of common shares of Sherritt International Corporation. 

  • NOTE: Bloomberg has identified the United States-based party as Dallas, Texas-based Albert Huddleston, although Mr. Huddleston has not publicly confirmed his connectivity with the consortium prior to or after the information published by Bloomberg.  There is speculation that neither Glencore International AG nor Mr. Huddleston are no longer members of the consortium.   

Absent United States-based connectivity, the Trump-Vance Administration is unlikely to approve an acquisition of Sherritt International Corporation and remove sanctions impacting the companies implemented by the BIS, OFAC, and United States Department of State.   

The Trump-Vance Administration strategies are designed to coerce management to abandon, exit, or restructure operations.  A primary goal is to require management to include a United States-based entity as a shareholder- preferably controlling and majority. 

Where a non-Republic of Cuba-based company has an operation subject to a claim certified by the USFCSC, the Trump-Vance Administration is requiring a settlement.   

  • There are 8,821 claims of which 5,913 awards valued at US$1,902,202,284.95 were certified by the USFCSC and have not been resolved for sixty-one years (some assets were officially confiscated in the 1960’s, some in the 1970’s and some in the 1990’s).  The USFCSC permitted simple interest (not compound interest) of 6% per annum (approximately US$114,132,137.10); with the approximate current value of the 5,913 certified claims is approximately US$9.4 billion.  

An acquisition of Sherritt International Corporation may be complicated or may be enhanced by a Libertad Act Title III Lawsuit filed on 29 July 2026. 

By incorporating a settlement of the third-largest certified claim with a settlement of a component of the largest certified claim, meaningful impediments would be addressed for United States-based companies as sources of Direct Foreign Investment (DFI) for the Republic of Cuba. 

Greenwich, Connecticut-based Atlas Holdings (2025 assets approximately US$16 billion) which owns Boca Raton-based Office Depot, Inc. (2025 revenue approximately US$7 billion) which is the owner of the Cuban Electric Company which has the largest certified claim valued at US$267,568,413.62, filed a Libertad Act Title III lawsuit again Republic of Cuba government-operated Union Electrica and Energas S.A. (within which Sherritt International Corporation has a 33% shareholding). 

  • From the company: “Headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut and founded in 2002, Atlas and its affiliates own and operate 27 companies, which employ more than 57,000 associates across more than 350 facilities worldwide. Atlas operates in sectors such as automotive supply, building materials, capital equipment, construction services, food manufacturing and distribution, metals processing, packaging, paper, power generation, printing, pulp, supply chain management and wood products. Atlas’ companies together generate approximately $18 billion in revenues annually.” 

CUBAN ELECTRIC COMPANY A/K/A COMPAÑIA CUBANA DE ELECTRICIDAD, Plaintiff, v. UNIÓN ELÉCTRICA AND ENERGAS S.A., Defendants. (1:26-cv-02675-JDB). NOTE: Steptoe LLP also represents the eighth-largest curtained claimant Spring, Texas-based ExxonMobil Corporation (2025 revenue approximately US$332 billion) in its Libertad Act Title III lawsuit filed in 2019 against Republic of Cuba government-operated Corporación Cimex, S.A., and Republic of Cuba government-operated Unión Cuba-Petróleo (CUPET).  Link To Complaint 

  • From the complaint: “Defendant Energas S.A. is an enterprise organized under the laws of Cuba as a joint venture with three equal owners: 1/3 owner UNE, 1/3 owner Unión Cubapetróleo (“CUPET”), Cuba’s state-owned oil company, and 1/3 owner Sherritt International Corporation (“Sherritt”), a minerals company which is a corporation organized under the laws of Canada with its principal place of business in Canada. Thus, Energas is majority-owned by Cuban state-owned entities. Energas processes raw natural gas, which is supplied to Energas free of charge by CUPET. Energas also generates electricity for sale to the national grid, providing approximately 10% of Cuba’s total electrical generating capacity. Energas’ principal place of business is in Cuba, and it has operations throughout the country.” 

The Trump-Pence Administration on 2 May 2019 made operational Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act of 1996 (known as “Libertad Act”). 

  • Title III authorizes lawsuits in United States District Courts against companies and individuals who are using a certified claim or non-certified claim where the owner of the certified claim or non-certified claim has not received compensation from the Republic of Cuba or from a third-party who is using (“trafficking”) the asset. Link To Libertad Act Lawsuit Filing Statistics

LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT

BICSA In Cuba Sanctioned- Obama Administration Permitted U.S. Bank To Have Correspondent Account With BICSA.

Cuba Sanctions

1276. On October 15, 2026, the Department of State designated the Banco Internacional de Comercio, S.A. (BICSA) pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14404. Are foreign persons, including foreign financial institutions (FFIs), subject to sanctions risk for transacting with BICSA?

Answer

The U.S. government does not intend to target foreign persons, including FFIs, pursuant to E.O. 14404 for engaging in transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the divestment from or the wind down of transactions involving BICSA, or any entity in which BICSA owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, through November 14, 2026. However, non-U.S. persons, including FFIs, should proceed with caution in any dealings with a party sanctioned under this authority. Actions to return assets to a sanctioned party or transfer them to another jurisdiction for potential use by the target could expose non-U.S. persons to significant sanctions risk.

Foreign persons unable to divest from or wind down transactions involving BICSA, or any entity in which BICSA owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, before November 14, 2026, are encouraged to contact the OFAC Compliance Hotline.

Persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction, including U.S. persons and entities owned or controlled by U.S. persons, should additionally note that this limited non-targeting posture does not authorize any transaction prohibited by the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR), 31 CFR part 515, or any other OFAC sanctions authority. Persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction have long been prohibited from transacting with BICSA, a Cuban State-Owned entity, absent OFAC authorization. Accordingly, persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction continue to be prohibited from engaging in transactions involving BICSA, including in connection with a non-U.S. person's wind down of activities with BICSA, unless separately authorized by OFAC. Relevant authorizations may include humanitarian and diplomatic-related transactions authorized under the CACR in subpart E of part 515 and under E.O. 14404 via General License (GL) 1 and GL 4A. For additional information on GL 1, see FAQ 1253.

Date Released- October 15, 2026

Sanctioning Cuban State-Owned Banco Internacional de Comercio, S.A. (BICSA)
October 15, 2026

President Trump has been absolutely clear:  under his administration, the United States will not tolerate terrorism, organized crime or extra-hemispheric forces spreading anti-American influence in our region.  For too long, Communist Cuba has been allowed to operate as an outpost for malign actors and terror groups – including the Islamic Republic of Iran, the world’s number one state sponsor of terrorism – to target the United States.

Cuba’s BANCO INTERNACIONAL DE COMERCIO S.A. (BICSA) has provided services to the designated Iran’s Karafarin Bank since at least 2022.  The Department of the Treasury sanctioned Karafarin Bank pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13902 in 2020.  Today, in concert with a Department of the Treasury action on Iranian financial actors, I am sanctioning the Cuban state-owned BICSA pursuant to Section 2(a)(i)(A) of E.O. 14404 for operating in or having operated in the financial services sector of the Cuban economy.

Let me be clear:  the Trump Administration will not tolerate a rogue state hosting hostile foreign military, intelligence and terror operations less than a hundred miles from the American homeland.  We will continue to aggressively identify and eliminate the Cuban regime’s financial and security interconnections with Iran and other dangerous and hostile states and actors.

The Department’s actions are being taken pursuant to E.O. 14404, which authorizes sweeping sanctions on Cuba, including against persons who support the Cuban regime’s security apparatus and those responsible for repression in Cuba and other threats to U.S. national security.  These actions also further both E.O. 14380, “Addressing Threats to the United States by the Government of Cuba” and National Security Presidential Memorandum 5, which directs the Executive Branch to improve human rights, encourage the rule of law, foster free markets and free enterprise, and promote democracy in Cuba.
Sanctions Implications 

As a result of today’s sanctions actions, and in accordance with E.O. 14404 of May 1, 2026, “Imposing Sanctions on Those Responsible for Repression in Cuba and for Threats to U.S. National Security and Foreign Policy,” all property and interests in property of the designated person described above that are in the United States or in possession or control of U.S. persons are blocked and must be reported to the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).  Additionally, all entities that are owned individually or in the aggregate, 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons are also blocked.

Any transaction or dealing by U.S. persons or persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States in property or interests of designated or otherwise blocked persons are prohibited unless authorized or exempt.  These prohibitions include the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any blocked person and the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.  Foreign persons that engage in transactions with persons designated pursuant to E.O. 14404—or that operate or have operated in the energy, defense and related materiel, metals and mining, financial services, or security sector of the Cuban economy, as identified in E.O. 14404—are themselves at risk of sanctions.  Non-U.S. persons, including foreign financial institutions, should proceed with caution in any dealings with a party sanctioned under this authority.  Actions to return assets to a sanctioned party or transfer them to another jurisdiction for potential use by the target expose non-U.S. persons to significant sanctions risk.  All property and interests in property of persons that are blocked pursuant to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR) are blocked.  The CACR prohibits persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction from dealing in property in which Cuba or a Cuban national has an interest, unless authorized or exempt.

The power and integrity of U.S. government sanctions derive not only from the U.S. government’s ability to designate and add persons to the List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List), but also from its willingness to remove persons from the SDN List consistent with the law.  The ultimate goal of sanctions is not to punish, but to bring about a positive change in behavior.

Petitions for removal from the SDN List may be routed through OFAC’s Reconsiderations Portal.  Petitioners may also refer to the Department of State’s Delisting Guidance page.

U.S. Ag/Food Exports To Cuba Increased 54.6% In August 2026; Decreased 3.4% Year-To-Year. Unleaded Gasoline- US$23.8 million, Motorcycles- US$3.7 Million. Exports May Surpass US$1 Billion In 2026.

ECONOMIC EYE ON CUBA©
October 2026

August 2026 Ag/Food Exports To Cuba Increase 54.6%- 1
Year-To-Year Decrease 3.4%- 2
40th Of 220 August 2026 U.S. Food/Ag Export Markets- 2
Year-To-Year Ranking 51st Of 220 U.S. Ag/Export Markets- 2
Re-Emerging Private Sector Exports Continue To Increase - 3
Trump-Vance Administration Fuels Authorization- US$74,863,132.00- 3 
August 2026 CDA Healthcare Product Exports US$0.00- 6
August 2026 Humanitarian Donations US$31,144,744.00- 7
U.S. Port Export Data- 20

AUGUST 2026 AG/FOOD EXPORTS TO CUBA INCREASE 54.6%-
Exports of food products and agricultural commodities from the United States to the Republic of Cuba in August 2026 were US$60,108,736.00 compared to US$38,862,688.00 in August 2025 and US$37,729,568.00in August 2024.  

US$314,296,814.00 for January 2026 through August 2026 compared with US$325,572,041.00 during the same time frame in 2025 representing a decrease of 3.4% year-to-year.

Highlights:  Gasoline vehicles (US$7 million), Motorcycles (US$3.7 million), Electric Vehicles (US$142,000.00), Solar Cell Assembled Modules (US$10.5 million), Lithium Ion Batteries (US$1.6 million), Corn Seeds (US$4,580.00), Unleaded Gasoline (US$23.8 million), Umbrellas (US$4,259.00), Compressed Liquefied Gas Container (US$76,860.00), Coin Operated Washing Machines (US$125,598.00).

Since 2022, when the first BIS license was issued for the export of vehicles to Republic of Cuba nationals and to private companies in the Republic of Cuba, the cumulative export value of the initiatives in place during the Obama-Biden Administration, Trump-Pence Administration, Biden-Harris Administration, and Trump-Vance Administration exceeds US$880 million of which electric and gasoline-powered new and used vehicles, bicycles, trucks, motorcycles and mopeds, and parts, exceeds US$333 million (Year 2026: US$106,660,349.00; Year 2025: US$149,413,031.00; Year 2024: US$67,241,234.00; Year 2023: US$10,546,419.00; Year 2022: US$89,848.00), and purchases (equipment and products) for use by the re-emerging private sector in the Republic of Cuba driving the growth.

Fuels/Oils exports: 2024 (US$938,894.00- including US$4,485.00 in gasoline), 2025 (US$311,558.00), 2026 (January thorugh August) US$231,744,309.00.

The data contains information on exports from the United States to the Republic of Cuba- products within the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act (TSREEA) of 2000, Cuban Democracy Act (CDA) of 1992, and regulations implemented (1992 to present) for other products by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) of the United States Department of Commerce, and United States Department of State.

The TSREEA re-authorized the direct commercial (on a cash basis) export of food products (including branded food products) and agricultural commodities from the United States to the Republic of Cuba, irrespective of purpose. The TSREEA does not include healthcare products, which remain authorized and regulated by the CDA.

The data represents the U.S. Dollar value of product exported from the United States to the Republic of Cuba under the TSREEA, CDA, and other regulations, specifically including products exported from the United States to the re-emerging private sector in the Republic of Cuba.

The data does not include transportation charges, bank charges, or other costs associated with exports; the government of the Republic of Cuba reports unverifiable data that includes transportation charges, bank charges, and other costs.

LINK TO COMPLETE REPORT IN PDF FORMAT

LINK TO COMPLETE LIST OF PRODUCTS IN 2026 EXPORTED FROM THE UNITED STATES TO CUBA

LINK TO COMPLETE LIST OF PRODUCTS IN 2025 EXPORTED FROM THE UNITED STATES TO CUBA

LINK TO COMPLETE LIST OF PRODUCTS IN 2024 EXPORTED FROM THE UNITED STATES TO CUBA

LINK TO 2026 U.S. PORT EXPORT DATA

UK-Based BAT Sells 50% Shareholding In Cuba Tobacco Joint Venture

British American Tobacco Leaves Cuba After 30 Years: Sold Its 50% Stake In Brascuba, The Factory Of H. Upmann And Cohiba 

CiberCuba
4 October 2026

British American Tobacco (BAT), one of the largest tobacco multinationals in the world, ended more than three decades of business presence in Cuba by selling its 50% stake in Brascuba Cigarrillos S.A., the joint venture associated with the production in the island of brands such as Popular, Cohiba, H. Upmann, and Romeo y Julieta. 

The operation has not yet occurred: the sale was completed in February 2026, although it has gained visibility now following the financial statements of the multinational and a study published by the German portal Kubakunde. 

The half-year report of British American Tobacco for the six months ending June 30 confirms that the group had agreed to sell its 50% stake in Brascuba to Tabagest S.A., a company established in Cuba that was already listed as an investor in the joint venture. 

The same document, also presented by BAT to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), specifies that the transaction was completed in February and that, from that point on, the Cuban business was deconsolidated from the group's balance sheet. 

The exit also had an economic impact for the multinational. BAT reported a net loss of 12 million pounds sterling related to the sale of Brascuba, a figure that includes four million pounds corresponding to previously recognized exchange losses. 

The financial report also explicitly acknowledges the impact of the Cuban withdrawal on its regional business.  When analyzing the results from America and Europe, BAT notes that the growth in revenue from combustible products in markets like Turkey was partially offset, among other factors, by "the exit from Cuba". 

The company's documents do not detail in that semiannual report the price paid by Tabagest. Kubakunde, based on BAT's financial documentation, estimates that the agreed price for the shares is approximately 25 million dollars, to which around 35 million dollars corresponding to the transfer of outstanding commercial credits against BAT subsidiaries in Brazil would have been added.  The German outlet also notes that BAT had previously accumulated impairments of around £231 million on assets related to Brascuba.  

The public documentation also does not clarify who ultimately controls Tabagest S.A.. BAT only identifies it as a company registered in Cuba and a previous shareholder of Brascuba, so there are not enough elements in those documents to attribute connections to other Cuban state conglomerates. 

Brascuba was founded in 1995 as a joint venture between the Cuban state monopoly Tabacuba and Souza Cruz, a Brazilian company that is part of the BAT group. Since then, it has become one of the most prominent foreign investments in the Cuban tobacco industry.  The company began producing Popular cigars in 1996 and subsequently manufactured, under license, cigarettes of brands such as Cohiba, H. Upmann, and Romeo y Julieta, for both the domestic market and export, as Kubakunde recalls. 

Brascuba also expanded its portfolio on the island over the years. In 2018, the company announced that it would begin manufacturing Dunhill cigarettes in Cuba, one of the premium brands of British American Tobacco, as part of a strategy to replace imports and increase domestic production.  The company also developed a modern factory in the Mariel Special Development Zone, a project announced in 2016 with an estimated investment of around 120 million dollars, and considered one of the largest industrial projects with foreign capital outside the tourism sector. 

The Cuban tobacco industry is also facing pressures in some of its traditional markets. In August, Cuba was involved in a diplomatic dispute with the United Kingdom over new measures against tobacco that could impact the marketing of cigars in that country, including the expansion of plain packaging to premium cigars.

Will Trump Administration Require Antilles Gold, Melbana Energy, Sherritt International To Pay Cuba Nationals In U.S. Dollars As Condition To Save Their Operations In Cuba?

Will Trump-Vance Administration Require Antilles Gold, Melbana Energy, And Sherritt International Corporation To Pay Cuba National Employees In U.S. Dollars As Condition For Approvals To Save Their Operations In Cuba? 

A Deal Clock Continues To Tick 

Does The White House Want Deals Implemented Or Want Only Discussion About Deals? 

In Australia, Canada, and United States, bondholders, exporters, employees, financial institutions, government officials, importers, investors, management, and shareholders are increasingly nervous.   

Simultaneously, those same constituencies in the People’s Republic of China and Russian Federation are sensing opportunities.  

For three Republic of Cuba-connected private-sector proposals to have successful trajectories, they require the decision-maker-in-chief in Washington DC to accept yes for an answer rather than an unabated strategy of pressure towards believing there is a better deal tomorrow than today or yesterday.   

Concern by law firms retained to represent companies whose interest is authorized engagement or authorized re-engagement with the Republic of Cuba is directed towards those advising the decision-maker-in-chief.   

Rather than abstain from making decisions- issuing authorizations and issuing licenses, attorneys are advocating to presidential advisors for prompt issuance of authorizations and issuing licenses so proposals may shift from ideas to negotiations and eventually to operations.  

  • NOTE: The issuance of authorizations and licenses does not mean once issued the United States government forgoes oversight.  The United States government retains authority to alter, revoke, or suspend an authorization and license if they are no longer in the interests of United States government policy.  This is nothing new. 

One, two, or three proposal disruptions could set in motion a chain of commercial, economic, financial, and political outcomes unlikely to create for the Trump-Vance Administration (2025-2029) desired cost-effective, efficient, timely, and transparent outcomes.   

Most importantly for the Trump-Vance Administration is likelihood that delay in providing authorizations and licenses put at risk an announcement by The White House of an investment trifecta where political prizes include resolution of two of the largest claims against the government of the Republic of Cuba certified by the United States Foreign Claims Settlement Commission (USFCSC) within the United States Department of Justice.  

The fear among management of United States-based companies is the Trump-Vance Administration will fail to deliver soon what United States-based companies need to negotiate deals prior to those deals becoming no longer viable.  Worse, that the deal process shifts from decisions by politicians and the officials who support them to decisions by the judicial branch- which means far more time and unpredictable outcomes. 

Management of United States-based companies are concerned Washington DC-based and Florida-based advocacy groups and lobbying organizations believe more financial advantage to them by deploying tactics to impede commercial opportunities from becoming realities than supporting commercial opportunities becoming realities. 

On 12 October 2026, one proposal expires.  Two others, while having no statutory expiration, do have consequential decisions to consider. 

Recent changes to the Labor Code in the Republic of Cuba may be the basis for the Trump-Vance Administration to require a company subject to United States jurisdiction operating in the energy/mineral sector within the internationally-recognized territory of the Republic of Cuba to compensate (salary, bonus, benefits) in U.S. Dollars or other convertible currency all employees who are Republic of Cuba nationals.  Such a position will complicate, but not derail interests. 

The Diaz-Canel-Valdes Mesa Administration (2019-2028) in Havana, Republic of Cuba, will grudgingly accept conditions from Bowral, Australia-based Antilles Gold Limited, Sydney, Australia-based Melbana Energy Limited, and Toronto, Canada-based Sherritt International Corporation (2025 revenue approximately US$389 million) required by authorizations and licenses from the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) of the United States Department of Commerce, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury, Office of Legal Adviser (OLA) of the United States Department of State, United States Department of Defense (War) Office of Strategic Capital, (OSC) and connectivity with the USFCSC.  

  • NOTE: The Commonwealth of Australia and Canada are members of the fifty-six-country Commonwealth created in 1931 by the United Kingdom (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales).  Charles III, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of His other Realms and Territories King, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith, is considered to be a friend of Donald Trump, President of the United States (2017-2021 and 2025-2029).  That friendship might be an impetus for a timely decision impacting two Australia-based companies and one Canada-based company.   

With every change my by the government of the Republic of Cuba to the commercial, economic, and financial infrastructure on the 800-mile archipelago home to approximately 9.5 million citizens, the Trump-Vance Administration will determine how to extract additional elasticity- moving how Cuba, Inc. operates nearer to how U.S.A., Inc. operates.     

If the Trump-Vance Administration requires what Antilles Gold Limited, Melbana Energy Limited, and Sherritt International Corporation find impossible to provide, then the government of the Republic of Cuba will engage with companies in the People’s Republic of China and Russian Federation who have an interest in cobalt, copper, gold, oil, nickel, and silver.  

For the Trump-Vance Administration, the United States Navy might then need be deployed to the Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea to prevent China-based companies and Russia-based companies from exporting cobalt, copper, gold, oil, nickel, and silver from the Republic of Cuba.  A costly exercise expensed to United States taxpayers. 

Link To Related Analyses 

Saving Antilles Gold: Will GEM Global Yield LLC SCS Obtain OFAC, BIS, Department Of State Authorizations? September 24, 2026 

Melbana Energy Of Australia Determining If Trump Administration Targeting Of Cuba Energy Sector Permits Continuing Operations. Similar Strategy To Australia's Antilles Gold September 23, 2026 

Might Trump Administration Focus On Sourcing Copper Lead To Approval Of U.S. Investor Control Of Copper, Gold, And Silver Operations Of Australia Company? September 11, 2026 

DOD (War) OSC Could Be U.S. Taxpayer Partner Of Last Resort For Canada’s Sherritt And Australia’s Antilles. Cobalt, Copper, Gold, Nickel, Silver Are Strategic Minerals. August 30, 2026 

Cuba: And Now There Are Two…  Antilles Gold Has Until 25 January 2027 And Sherritt International Has Until 12 October 2026 August 27, 2026 

Potential Triple Play? Carney, Diaz-Canel, Trump Deal. U.S. Secretary Of Defense Hegseth Wants Cobalt. Cuba Has It. Settling One Libertad Act Issue. And Opening Doors? August 23, 2025

LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT

CiberCuba
3 October 2026

Foreign companies can now hire directly in Cuba, but are they allowed to pay salaries in dollars? 

“The recent authorization for certain companies and foreign representatives to directly hire Cuban workers has raised an unavoidable question: if the foreign company becomes the employer, will it also be able to pay salaries directly in dollars?  The response arising from the new regulations is more complex than a simple yes or no. Direct hiring eliminates the obligation to use a state employer in certain cases, but does not automatically convert the salary into a payment in foreign currency. 

The new Cuban Labor Code maintains an explicit rule: the salary is a remuneration in Cuban pesos and must be paid in CUP. At the same time, other regulations allow certain workers to receive gratuities in foreign currency, a legal category different from salary. 

What changed with direct contracting?  October 2 in Official Gazette No. 82, allows foreign commercial representations established in Cuba to directly hire their employees.  Until now, hiring had to be carried out exclusively through employer entities authorized by the Ministry of Labor and Social Security, which formalized the employment relationship with the worker and then provided that workforce to the foreign representation. 

The outlines the new system and establishes that foreign commercial representations can hire directly or may continue to rely on an employer entity.  When opting for direct hiring, the representation itself assumes the role of employer and must comply with Cuban labor and social security legislation. 

The key to understanding what currency can be used appears in a regulation published just two weeks prior: Article 7 expressly states that foreign investment modalities and foreign commercial representations based in Cuba are governed by the Labor Code, along with the adjustments provided in their specific regulations.  Article 246 is even more precise: it defines salary as “the payment in Cuban pesos that the employer pays to the worker”.  Article 261 establishes that the salary is paid in Cuban pesos at least once a month, whether in cash, through a banking instrument, or electronically.  Therefore, the possibility of a foreign commercial representation directly signing a contract with a Cuban worker does not in itself authorize the establishment of that ordinary salary in dollars, euros, or another foreign currency. 

What fundamentally changes is who acts as the employer and who signs the contract, not the currency in which the Labor Code defines the salary.  Salary and bonus are not the same.  Here a fundamental difference appears.  The Labor Code itself states that a person's remuneration can consist of salary and other legally established income.  Article 246 clearly states that bonuses are not considered salary.  This opens up the possibility for certain workers to receive additional income in foreign currency without those payments replacing the mandatory salary in CUP. 

The Foreign Investment Law does provide for bonuses in foreign currency.  The situation is particularly clear for the so-called foreign investment modalities.  The updated version of the , modified in 2026, establishes in its Article 29 that joint ventures, fully foreign-owned enterprises, and international economic association contracts can create incentive funds using their profits.  The same provision states that workers “may receive bonuses in foreign currency, provided that the form of foreign investment generates them”.  This means that a worker can have a salary subject to general rules in Cuban pesos and, in addition, receive certain additional payments in foreign currency when specific legislation allows for it.  They are not legally the same.  Not all foreign companies fall into the same category. 

This distinction is particularly important because a foreign commercial representation is not necessarily a form of foreign investment under Law 118 which includes mixed enterprises, wholly foreign-owned companies, and international economic association contracts as its fundamental modalities.  For these entities, direct contracting had already been relaxed in September through the and the modifications introduced in the Foreign Investment Law. 

The reform of October 2 extends a similar logic to foreign commercial representations, but through another regulatory package: Decree-Law 137 and Resolution 62.  And what about the bonuses for branch and representation workers?  The Cuban legislation already acknowledges the existence of bonuses received by workers linked to branches of foreign firms and other representations.  The law explicitly mentions individuals who receive bonuses for working in branches of foreign commercial firms, representative offices of banks, financial companies, and other representations of foreign entities accredited in Cuba.  But having that additional income recognized for tax purposes does not convert a bonus into salary nor does it automatically allow for the replacement of the salary in CUP with a monthly payment in dollars.  The Central Bank allows currency transfers, but only when they are authorized.  Another element that can cause confusion arises in the banking regulation. 

The sets new rules for foreign currency bank accounts and includes transfers from legal entities to individuals for reasons such as remunerations, bonuses, authorized travel expenses, and per diems.The key word is "authorized."  The Resolution 102 regulates how a payment in foreign currency can be processed bank-wise when there is a legal basis to do so, but it does not replace labor legislation nor does it by itself constitute a general authorization to pay any salary in dollars.   

What changes then for the worker?  The change is not insignificant.  When a foreign commercial representation uses direct contracting, the worker signs their contract with the representation itself, and it assumes the responsibility of the employer, instead of maintaining a contractual relationship with a state intermediary agency.  Resolution 62 also establishes that those who were already working for these representations cannot receive lower income than what they earned prior to the transition.  For foreign investment modalities, a similar situation occurs under Resolution 56: the company can hire directly and assume the corresponding labor and social security obligations.  But the liberalization of who is hired does not equate to a complete liberalization of how payments are made. 

So, can a foreign company offer a monthly salary of US$500.00?  With the revised regulations, direct hiring alone does not provide a basis for replacing the legal salary in Cuban pesos with an ordinary salary expressed entirely in dollars.  The Labor Code explicitly maintains the salary in CUP.  It is different in that, in addition to the salary, there are bonuses or other income in foreign currency expressly permitted by the regulations applicable to each type of company or representation, which can be channeled through the banking system.  Therefore, the main novelty of the reforms is not that Cuban workers have started to be paid automatically in dollars, but that certain foreign companies can hire directly and negotiate the employment relationship without the mandatory mediation of a state employer entity.  The dollar may appear as a bonus or additional income in authorized cases. The salary, according to the current Labor Code, continues to be in Cuban pesos.”

Vima Of Spain Departing Cuba Less Than One Month After Ending Trump-Connected Lobbying Contract. Will Government Of Spain Or EU Do Anything? Not Likely.

On 24 July 2026, Madrid, Spain-based Vima World S.L. retained Washington DC-based Continental Strategy LLC for US$30,000.00 for matters relating to TRD: Trade (Domestic and Foreign); FOO: Food Industry- Safety, Labeling, etc.; and FOR: Foreign Relations.  On 1 September 2026, the agreement was terminated.  Now, the company has reportedly ceased operations in the Republic of Cuba.

Neither the leadership of the Brussels, Belgium-based European Commission (EC) nor leadership of the Brussels, Belgium-based European Council (EC) nor members of the twenty-seven country Brussels, Belgium-based European Union (EU) taken any decision to add Trump-Vance Administration (2025-2029) Executive Order 14404 to the Annex to its Blocking Statute that includes specific extraterritorial measures, including the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act of 1996 (known as “Libertad Act”) and Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR) issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury. 

  • EU: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden.  

Cuba Headlines
3 September 2026
Excerpt


“The Spanish food company, Vima, has removed its branding and all corporate signage from its sole Havana store, located at Infanta and Santa Marta in Central Havana, on September 30th. This move is widely viewed as a direct response to the increased pressure from US sanctions against GAESA, the business conglomerate run by the Cuban military.

According to reports from international media, the decision came just a day after the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced its most comprehensive sanctions package against Cuba to date, on September 29th. The sanctions, which took immediate effect, prohibit indirect transactions with entities on the Cuba Restricted List and eliminate so-called U-Turn transactions, while also blocking Cuban private entrepreneurs' bank accounts in the US.

Two employees at the Infanta and Santa Marta store confirmed to 14ymedio the nature of the pullback. "The company is in the process of withdrawing," one worker stated. Marks from the removed signs were still visible on the storefront, according to the media outlet.

The store operated in partnership with Cimex, a corporation part of GAESA, and Vima's products occupied a substantial portion of its shelves. While some canned and packaged items from Vima remained, fresh products had disappeared.

The contraction signs extended beyond the store. At the Berroa warehouses, east of the capital, only one of the three facilities linked to Vima still had goods, with the other two sitting empty, although employees in company uniforms were still present.

Vima's reliance on Cuba was significant. The company's food division, based in A Coruña, generated approximately 106 million euros in 2025, with roughly 49 million euros (about 46%) stemming from operations on the island, according to US State Department data. Cuba was its largest market, surpassing the Dominican Republic (33 million euros) and Mexico (15.4 million euros).  This market exposure was built through its subsidiary, Vima Caribe S.A., which partners locally with Tiendas Caribe, an entity linked to the Cuban military. In May 2024, Vima signed an agreement to manage 20 stores on the island and exports products from the US via Vima USA Ltd., with offices in New York and Miami, exposing it to US sanctions through two different channels.

Vima's attempt to mitigate political pressure unraveled quickly. In July, the company hired lobbying firm Continental Strategy LLC—whose partners include former US Ambassador to the OAS Carlos Trujillo and former Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Alberto Martínez—to handle its interests in Washington. However, the $37,742 contract was terminated just five weeks later, on September 1st, according to an investigation into the failed lobbying effort. A few weeks later, Vima's branding disappeared from the Havana store.

The situation with Vima adds to a growing list of foreign companies that have exited or scaled back operations in Cuba since the US formally designated GAESA under Executive Order 14404 on May 7th. Prior to Vima, hotel chains like Meliá, Iberostar, Barceló, and Blue Diamond Resorts either left or reduced their hotel operations. Vima's case marks the expansion of this phenomenon into food supply through foreign currency stores, a key channel for imported goods among Cubans with access to foreign currency.

Vima has not released an official statement on whether the withdrawal is permanent, a rebranding, or a temporary pause. The Spanish government pledged on September 23rd to defend its businesses and opposed the extraterritoriality of the sanctions, but no practical outcomes have materialized.

In August, US Deputy Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Juan Pablo Segura, warned, "Foreign companies wishing to invest in Cuba must partner with a Cuban state enterprise, making them complicit in the dictatorship's corruption scheme."”

Cuba Government: "We are aware that we are alone." Why Are They Alone? They Have Not (Yet) Created Enough Value To Others So As To Not Be Alone.

“We are aware that we are alone.  If we have to face foreign aggression, we must keep in mind that perhaps no country will come to our aid.”  Carlos Fernández de Cossío, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cuba (2022- ), to Washington Journal (27 September 2026).

Trump Administration Suggesting Cuba Entrepreneurs Become Authors If They Want A Bank Account In The United States.

748. May U.S. banks open and operate accounts for Cuban nationals present in Cuba? 

“Yes. Section 515.584(h) of the CACR contains a general license that allows banking institutions to open and maintain bank accounts in the United States solely in the name of a Cuban national located in Cuba, to receive payments in the United States for transactions authorized pursuant to, or exempt from the prohibitions of, the CACR and to remit such payments back to Cuba, including through an online payment platform. For example, an author who is a Cuban national located in Cuba may open an account with a bank in the United States to receive payments for sales of their book.  On September 30, 2026, OFAC amended § 515.584 to remove the authorization for U.S. banking institutions to open and maintain an account solely in the name of a Cuban national who is an independent private sector entrepreneur (as defined in 31 CFR § 515.340) for the purpose of conducting authorized or exempt transactions. Unless separately authorized, banking institutions subject to U.S. jurisdiction are required to immediately block these funds and accounts, and will require a specific license from OFAC to unblock any such accounts or funds.”

9,000 Words: OFAC Issues New And Revised Cuba Regulations And Issues OFAC Alert. Good Banking News For Cuba Authors; Not So For Cuba Entrepreneurs.

U.S. Tightens Cuba Sanctions to Counter Regime Repression
Press Statement
September 30, 2026


This week, the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published new Cuba Sanctions Regulations implementing President Trump’s Executive Order 14404, “Imposing Sanctions on Those Responsible for Repression in Cuba and Threats to the United States National Security and Foreign Policy,” which invokes the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to significantly broaden and sharpen sanctions and economic pressure on Communist Cuba, its repressive military and intelligence apparatus, subversive and terror networks, and financial enablers. Treasury also amended the longstanding Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR) to close loopholes the Cuban regime has long exploited to engage in sanctions evasion, enrich regime insiders, and fund dangerous subversive and military activities which threaten the national security of the United States.  The Trump Administration remains committed to leveraging all available sanctions authorities to drive meaningful reform in Cuba, support the Cuban people’s aspirations for freedom, and hold accountable the individuals and entities that pose a threat to the national security of the United States.

Publication of Regulatory Amendments

The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing a rule removing duplicative regulatory provisions and reorganizing multiple parts within the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Through these actions, OFAC is eliminating over 100 subparts from its chapter of the CFR, and making information regarding delegations of authority, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements, and the Paperwork Reduction Act easier to locate.

Additionally, OFAC is amending the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations to incorporate Executive Order (E.O.) 13902 of January 10, 2020, "Imposing Sanctions With Respect to Additional Sectors of Iran."

OFAC is also publishing regulations to implement E.O. 14404 of May 1, 2026, "Imposing Sanctions on Those Responsible for Repression in Cuba and Threats to the United States National Security and Foreign Policy." Further, OFAC is amending the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515 (CACR) to implement portions of the President's foreign policy toward Cuba.

These rules are currently available for public inspection with the Federal Register and will take effect upon publication in the Federal Register on September 30, 2026.

OFAC is also issuing five new, Cuba-related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs 1271–1275) and 29 amended, Cuba-related Frequently Asked Questions.

Finally, OFAC is publishing an OFAC Alert, "Expanded Sanctions Against Cuba," which highlights increased sanctions risks for transactions involving Cuba.

Link To Federal Register Document

Link One- OFAC Alert

Link Two

Link Three

1275. How does the September 30, 2026 amendment to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR) affect previous authorizations for professional meetings or conferences in Cuba?  Effective September 30, 2026, OFAC amended § 515.564 to eliminate the authorization related to the attendance at, or organization of, professional meetings or conferences in Cuba. Persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction are no longer authorized to attend or organize professional meetings or conferences in Cuba. OFAC is replacing that authorization with a limited wind down authorization for persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction who were in Cuba on September 30, 2026 pursuant to the former professional meetings authorization to engage in travel-related and other previously authorized transactions through October 30, 2026, provided they depart Cuba by October 30, 2026. In addition, OFAC is also authorizing persons to terminate and obtain refunds for travel and related transactions for trips consistent with the former professional meetings authorization until October 30, 2026.

1274. How does the September 30, 2026 amendment to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR) affect educational travel to Cuba by persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction?  Effective September 30, 2026, OFAC narrowed the authorization for persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction, including U.S. academic institutions and their faculty, staff, and students, to engage in certain education-related transactions involving Cuba. Persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction that wish to engage in educational activities, including travel-related transactions, involving Cuba must now fit within one of these categories:  Educational Activities by Accredited U.S. Undergraduate or Graduate-Degree Granting Institutions: 31 CFR § 515.565(a)(1) authorizes accredited U.S. undergraduate or graduate-degree granting institutions, their students, and full time permanent employees to engage in certain educational activities, such as noncommercial research in Cuba specifically related to Cuba and for the purpose of obtaining a graduate degree, under the auspices of the academic institution without accompaniment by a representative from a sponsoring organization.  Educational Activities by Other Institutions: § 515.565(a)(2) authorizes certain educational activities not authorized under § 515.565(a)(1), such as certain educational exchanges sponsored by Cuban or U.S. secondary schools, provided that the activity takes places under the auspices of an organization subject to U.S. jurisdiction and that all travelers are accompanied by a representative of the sponsoring organization.  Additionally, OFAC removed the previous authorization at § 515.565(b) for group people-to-people educational travel.  OFAC replaced these education-related authorizations with "grandfathering" provisions authorizing certain educational travel and group people-to-people educational travel that previously was authorized under § 515.565(a) and § 515.565(b), respectively, where the traveler has already completed at least one travel-related transaction (such as purchasing a flight or reserving accommodation) prior to September 30, 2026.

1273. How does the September 30, 2026 amendment to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR) affect previous authorizations related to Cuban private sector entrepreneurs?  Effective September 30, 2026, OFAC amended § 515.584(h) to remove the authorization for banking institutions subject to U.S. jurisdiction to open and maintain accounts solely in the name of a Cuban national who is an independent private sector entrepreneur, as defined in § 515.340, for the purposes of conducting certain transactions authorized or exempt under the CACR. Unless separately authorized, banking institutions subject to U.S. jurisdiction are required to immediately block these funds and accounts, and will require a specific license from OFAC to unblock any such accounts or funds.

1272. How does the September 30, 2026 amendment to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR) affect those previously authorized "U-turn" transactions in which Cuba or a Cuban national has an interest?  Effective September 30, 2026, OFAC amended 31 CFR § 515.584(d) by removing the authorization for banking institutions subject to U.S. jurisdiction to process transactions that originate and terminate outside the United States, provided that neither the originator nor the beneficiary was a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction (the "U-turn general license"). Pursuant to 31 CFR § 515.584(d), banking institutions subject to U.S. jurisdiction are now only authorized to reject (vice block) such transactions.  To account for the removal of the "U-Turn" authorization, OFAC also amended § 515.584(e) to remove the authorization for the unblocking and return of any transfer that would have been authorized pursuant to the prior "U-Turn" general license.

1271. How does the September 30, 2026 amendment to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR) affect prohibitions related to the U.S. Department of State's List of Restricted Entities and Subentities Associated with Cuba (Cuba Restricted List or CRL)?  Effective September 30, 2026, OFAC amended § 515.209 to reflect the expanded scope of activities for which the Secretary of State, as directed by the 2025 National Security Presidential Memorandum-5 (NSPM-5), may add entities or subentities to the CRL. Specifically, the Secretary of State may now add to the CRL any entities or subentities that are under the control of, or act for or on behalf of, or for the benefit of, the Cuban military, intelligence, or security services or personnel and with which direct or indirect financial transactions would disproportionately benefit such services or personnel at the expense of the Cuban people or private enterprise in Cuba.  Additionally, the prohibition at 31 CFR § 515.209 previously prohibited persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction from engaging in "direct financial transactions" with entities or subentities on the CRL. Effective September 30, 2026, OFAC amended § 515.209 to also prohibit persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction from engaging in an "indirect financial transaction" with any entity or subentity on the CRL. See the prohibition at § 515.209 and FAQ 735 for more information regarding a "direct" and "indirect" financial transaction.  Further, to guard against evasion of the prohibition on direct or indirect transactions with entities or subentities on the CRL, OFAC also amended § 515.201(c) to add a prohibition on any transaction that has the purpose or effect of evading or avoiding prohibitions on direct or indirect transactions with entities or subentities on the CRL.  To account for these changes, OFAC amended the following general licenses that previously only excluded direct financial transactions with entities or subentities on the CRL to now also exclude indirect financial transactions with such entities: §§ 515.530 (powers of attorney); 515.534 (contingent contracts); 515.545 (information/informational materials); 515.560 (travel-related transactions); 515.561 (family visits); 515.564 (professional research); 515.565 (educational activities); 515.566 (religious activities); 515.567 (public performances); 515.572 (travel services); 515.573 (physical and business presence in Cuba); 515.574 (support for the Cuban people); 515.576 (private foundations or research or educational institutes); 515.577 (publishing); 515.578 (internet-based services); 515.581 (conferences in third countries); 515.584 (certain financial transactions); and 515.590 (certain grants, scholarships, and awards). For a complete description of what each general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see the aforementioned general licenses.  OFAC also amended 31 CFR § 515.421 to clarify that transactions ordinarily incident to licensed transactions do not include direct or indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities on the CRL if the terms of the applicable general or specific license expressly exclude such direct or indirect financial transactions.

794. What types of grants or awards in which Cuba or a Cuban national has an interest are authorized for persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction to provide? Section 515.590 of the CACR authorizes the provision of certain grants, scholarships, or awards to Cuban nationals or in which Cuba or a Cuban national has an interest. Such grants, scholarships, or awards must relate to educational activities, certain humanitarian projects (as set forth in § 515.575 (b)), scientific research, or religious activities. This general license excludes direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.590. 

774. May U.S. insurers issue policies and pay claims related to group health, life, and travel insurance on behalf of third-country nationals traveling to or within Cuba?  Yes, provided that the insurance policy is a global policy, and not specific to the third-country national’s travel to or within Cuba. Section 515.580 of the CACR authorizes persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction to issue or provide global health, life, or travel insurance policies for individuals ordinarily resident in a country outside of Cuba who travel to or within Cuba, regardless of whether the insurance policy is issued only to that individual or to a group, such as to all employees of a particular company. For instance, a U.S. insurer may pay medical claims pursuant to a group health insurance policy to or on behalf of a covered third-country national injured while traveling in Cuba. However, this provision does not authorize a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction to issue an insurance policy that is specific to travel to Cuba. A separate provision of the CACR, § 515.560, authorizes the provision of health, life, and travel insurance-related services that are specific to Cuba for authorized U.S. travelers. However, please note that § 515.560 excludes from the authorization at § 515.560(c)(2) the lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba on the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List to the extent prohibited by § 515.210, as well as any direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with any entity or subentity on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. For a complete description of the scope of this prohibition, see 31 CFR § 515.210. 

766. What types of payment or financing terms may be utilized for authorized exports and reexports of items other than agricultural commodities to Cuba?  Section 515.533(a) of the CACR does not restrict payment and financing terms for exports of items from the United States or reexports of 100 percent U.S-origin items from a third country, other than agricultural commodities. Examples of permissible payment and financing terms for authorized exports and reexports that are not agricultural commodities include: payment of cash in advance; sales on an open account; and financing by U.S. or third-country financial institutions.  OFAC has issued a general license authorizing banking institutions to provide financing for such authorized exports or reexports of items other than agricultural commodities, including issuing, advising, negotiating, paying, or confirming letters of credit (including letters of credit issued by a financial institution that is a national of Cuba), accepting collateral for issuing or confirming letters of credit, and processing documentary collections. For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.584(f). With the exception of transactions related to exports or reexports of medicines or medical supplies, items associated with the provision of telecommunications and internet services for the Cuban people, or items associated with air and sea operations that support permissible travel, cargo, or trade, the general license at § 515.584(f) excludes direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. For a description of the scope of the prohibition on direct and indirect financial transactions and the restrictions and exceptions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.209.

765. May persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction open an office in Cuba?  Pursuant to 31 CFR § 515.573, persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction may establish and maintain a physical presence, such as an office, warehouse, or retail outlet, in Cuba to engage in transactions authorized by or exempt from the CACR in the following categories: entities engaging in non-commercial activities authorized by section 515.574 (support for the Cuban people); entities engaging in humanitarian projects set forth in section 515.575(b) (humanitarian projects); private foundations or research or educational institutes engaging in transactions authorized by § 515.576; news bureaus; exporters of certain goods authorized for export or reexport pursuant to 31 CFR §§ 515.533 and 515.559; entities providing mail or parcel transmission services; providers of telecommunications or internet-based services; entities organizing or conducting certain educational activities; religious organizations; and providers of carrier and certain travel services. These persons may employ Cuban nationals in Cuba as well as persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction in Cuba (and such persons may maintain a domicile in Cuba). These persons may open and maintain bank accounts to facilitate authorized transactions. 31 CFR § 515.573 excludes from the authorization direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.573. Persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction that do not meet the terms of the general license may apply to OFAC for a specific license. Such applications will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Additional authorizations from the Cuban government may also be required.

761. Can U.S. trade delegations travel to Cuba?  Trade delegations are authorized to travel to Cuba only if each member of the delegation meets the criteria of an applicable general license authorizing travel to Cuba or has obtained a specific license from OFAC. Authorized trade delegations generally fall under one of two general licenses for travel authorization: either (1) 31 CFR § 515.533(c)(1), which authorizes travel-related and other transactions incident to the exportation of certain authorized goods from the U.S. to Cuba, specifically the conduct of "market research, commercial marketing, sales or contract negotiation, accompanied delivery, installation, leasing, servicing, or repair in Cuba of items consistent with the export or reexport licensing policy of the Commerce Department,” or (2) 31 CFR § 515.564(a)(1), which authorizes transactions related to professional research in Cuba. Both general licenses exclude from the authorizations lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba on the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List to the extent prohibited by § 515.210.  For a complete description of the scope of this prohibition, see 31 CFR § 515.210.  In addition, the general license related to professional research in Cuba excludes from its authorization direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities or subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List.  For a complete description of the scope of this prohibition, see 31 CFR § 515.209.

760. How do U.S. companies know if a Cuban counterpart is affiliated with an entity or subentity on the Cuba Restricted List?
  The names of the entities and subentities that the State Department identifies as under the control of, or acting for or on behalf of, or for the benefit of, the Cuban military, intelligence, or security services or personnel and with which direct or indirect financial transactions would disproportionally benefit such services or personnel at the expense of the Cuban people or private enterprise in Cuba are published on the Cuba Restricted List (CRL), which is available on the State Department’s website and in the Federal Register (updates to the CRL will also be published in the Federal Register).  Entities or subentities that are owned or controlled by another entity or subentity on the CRL are not treated as restricted unless also specified by name on the CRL.

758. Is Cuba open for U.S. business and investment?  Persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction are prohibited from doing business or investing in Cuba unless authorized by OFAC.  An OFAC general license authorizes, subject to certain conditions and limitations, the exportation from the United States, and the reexportation from third countries, of items to Cuba where the exportation or reexportation is licensed or otherwise authorized by BIS.  See 31 CFR § 515.533(a). BIS currently authorizes certain categories of items to be exported or reexported to Cuba. In addition, OFAC currently generally licenses the establishment of a business presence or physical presence in Cuba for certain types of entities or persons.  See 31 CFR § 515.573. The general licenses for the establishment of a business presence or physical presence in Cuba exclude from the authorizations direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. For a description of the scope of the prohibition on direct or indirect financial transactions and the restrictions and exceptions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.209.

757. Are U.S. banking institutions authorized to process "U-turn" transactions in which Cuba or a Cuban national has an interest?  No. Effective September 30, 2026, banking institutions subject to U.S. jurisdiction are prohibited from processing "U-turn" transactions, i.e., funds transfers originating and terminating outside the United States, where neither the originator nor the beneficiary is a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction. However, banking institutions subject to U.S. jurisdiction are authorized pursuant to 31 CFR § 515.584(d) to reject (vice block) such "U-turn" transactions.

756. May a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction utilize online payment platforms to facilitate or process authorized transactions involving Cuba or a Cuban entity?  Yes. Subject to certain exceptions, transactions that are ordinarily incident to an authorized transaction are permitted. See the examples in 31 CFR § 515.421. Such transactions may include use of online payment platforms to facilitate authorized transactions. Authorized transactions ordinarily incident to licensed transactions exclude any direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transaction with Cuba Restricted List (CRL) entities, as well as lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba on the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List to the extent prohibited by § 515.210, if the terms of the applicable general or specific license expressly exclude such transactions. See 31 CFR § 515.421(5)-(6). Also, 31 CFR § 515.421 tfurther notes that a transaction relating to the collection, forwarding, or receipt of remittances involving any entity or subentity identified on the CRL is not authorized as an ordinarily incident transaction where the terms of the general or specific license expressly exclude any such transactions. For a complete description of the scope of transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction and the restrictions and exceptions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.421.

754. Is the U.S. originating bank, U.S. intermediary bank, or U.S. beneficiary bank required to independently verify that a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction is not engaging in a direct or indirect financial transaction as defined in § 515.209 when processing Cuba-related transactions?  No. To the extent the transaction involves an entity or subentity on the Cuba Restricted List, a financial institution can rely on the statements of its customer or information available to them in the ordinary course of business that the transaction is authorized unless it knows or has reason to know the transaction is not authorized. A banking institution is expected to conduct a level of due diligence commensurate with its overall risk profile and internal compliance policies and procedures with respect a transaction involving Cuba or a Cuban national and which may be authorized pursuant to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations.

748. May U.S. banks open and operate accounts for Cuban nationals present in Cuba?  Yes. Section 515.584(h) of the CACR contains a general license that allows banking institutions to open and maintain bank accounts in the United States solely in the name of a Cuban national located in Cuba, to receive payments in the United States for transactions authorized pursuant to, or exempt from the prohibitions of, the CACR and to remit such payments back to Cuba, including through an online payment platform. For example, an author who is a Cuban national located in Cuba may open an account with a bank in the United States to receive payments for sales of their book.  On September 30, 2026, OFAC amended § 515.584 to remove the authorization for U.S. banking institutions to open and maintain an account solely in the name of a Cuban national who is an independent private sector entrepreneur (as defined in 31 CFR § 515.340) for the purpose of conducting authorized or exempt transactions. Unless separately authorized, banking institutions subject to U.S. jurisdiction are required to immediately block these funds and accounts, and will require a specific license from OFAC to unblock any such accounts or funds.

745. May U.S. banks open and operate accounts for Cuban nationals lawfully present in the United States?  Yes.  Pursuant to section 515.571(a)(5) of the CACR, banking institutions are permitted to maintain accounts for certain Cuban nationals present in the United States in a non-immigrant status or pursuant to other non-immigrant travel authorization.  Although the account may remain open while the Cuban national is not in the United States, access to such accounts must be limited to periods during which the Cuban national is lawfully present in the United States.  For a complete description of what the OFAC general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.571(a)(5).

737. Are authorized travelers permitted to open bank accounts in Cuba?
  Yes.  Persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction who are traveling to Cuba pursuant to one of the 12 authorized categories of travel may open and maintain bank accounts in order to access funds while located in Cuba for authorized transactions, and are authorized to close such accounts.  For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR §  515.560(c)(6). This general license excludes direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. For a description of the scope of the prohibition on direct or indirect financial transactions and the restrictions and exceptions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.209.

736. May the U.S. dollar be used to conduct transactions in Cuba or with Cuban nationals?  Yes, under certain circumstances. Persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction may engage in transactions in U.S. dollars in Cuba or with Cuban nationals with respect to activity that is authorized pursuant to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR). For example, payments for telecommunications services in Cuba provided pursuant to 31 CFR § 515.542 may be provided in U.S. dollars. Further, the use of U.S. dollars for transactions that are exempt from the prohibitions of, or authorized by, the CACR is also allowed. For example, payments related to the importation or exportation of informational materials as defined in 31 CFR § 515.332, such as books or musical recordings, may be made in U.S. dollars.  Please note that, effective September 30, 2026, banking institutions subject to U.S. jurisdiction are no longer authorized to process transactions in which Cuba or a Cuban national has an interest that originate and terminate outside the United States, even where neither the originator nor the beneficiary is a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction (i.e., "U-turn" transactions). Such banking institutions are now only authorized to reject (vice block) these transactions.

735. What would constitute What are examples of a direct or indirect financial transactions with an entity or subentity on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List (CRL) prohibited by 31 CFR § 515.209?  What are some examples of this prohibited conduct?  Section 515.209 prohibits persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction from engaging in a direct or, effective September 30, 2026, an indirect financial transaction with entities and subentities on the CRL. A person engages in a direct financial transaction by either acting as the originator on a transfer of funds whose ultimate beneficiary is on the CRL or as the ultimate beneficiary on a transfer of funds whose originator is an entity or subentity on the CRL, including a transaction by wire transfer, credit card, check, or payment of cash. A person engages in an indirect financial transaction by participating in a transfer of funds despite not acting as an originator or ultimate beneficiary of that funds transfer, where either the originator or the ultimate beneficiary is an entity or subentity on the CRL, including a transaction by wire transfer, credit card, check, or payment of cash. This definition of "indirect financial transaction" is unique to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations and should not be interpreted to apply to other OFAC programs.  Below are some examples of direct and indirect financial transactions that 31 CFR § 515.209 would prohibit.  

Direct Financial Transactions

  • A person subject to U.S. jurisdiction is traveling to Cuba to engage in an authorized family visit pursuant to 31 CFR § 515.561. The traveler books and pays for a hotel room directly with a hotel included on the CRL. This is a prohibited direct financial transaction because the traveler is a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction who would be the originator of a transfer of funds (i.e., payment for the room) whose ultimate beneficiary would be a hotel that is on the CRL.

  • An individual working for a church subject to U.S. jurisdiction is interested in establishing a physical presence in Cuba pursuant to 31 CFR § 515.573(d)(3). The individual signs a new contract directly with a real estate company on the CRL to rent a location for the church’s physical presence, and the church begins making rent payments shortly thereafter. This is a prohibited direct financial transaction because the church is a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction who would be originating a transfer of funds (i.e., rent payments) whose ultimate beneficiary would be an entity on the CRL.

  • A person subject to U.S. jurisdiction is traveling to Cuba to engage in professional research pursuant to 31 CFR § 515.564(a). The traveler books a stay a hotel that is on the CRL through a travel agency that is not subject to U.S. jurisdiction. The traveler pays for the trip, including for the room at the hotel, through the travel agency so that the traveler pays the travel agency, which in turn pays the Cuban entities, including the hotel. This is a prohibited direct financial transaction because the traveler is a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction who would be originating a transfer of funds (i.e., payment for the room) whose ultimate beneficiary would be an entity on the CRL.

Indirect Financial Transactions

  • A Cuban beverage manufacturer on the CRL seeks to pay for goods provided by a fruit supply company that is not subject to U.S. jurisdiction. The payment is routed to the fruit supply company’s bank via a U.S. correspondent bank. This is a prohibited indirect financial transaction because the U.S. bank is acting as an intermediary in a transfer of funds that originates from an entity on the CRL.

  • A U.S. banking institution processes a payment from a non-U.S. person tourist for goods at a Cuban store on the CRL. This is a prohibited indirect financial transaction because the U.S. banking institution is acting as an intermediary in a transfer of funds where the ultimate beneficiary is an entity on the CRL.

  • A U.S. banking institution processes a payment from a non-U.S. person tourist to a Cuban hotel on the CRL. This is a prohibited indirect financial transaction because the U.S. banking institution is acting as an intermediary in a transfer of funds where the ultimate beneficiary is an entity on the CRL.

Please note that § 515.201(c) also prohibits any transaction for the purpose or which has the effect of evading or avoiding § 515.209’s prohibition on engaging in a direct or indirect financial transaction with entities or subentities on the CRL.

734. What is the Cuba Restricted List and how does it impact Cuba-related transactions?
  The State Department publishes a list of entities and subentities that the Secretary of State has determined are under the control of, or act for, on behalf of, or for the benefit of the Cuban military, intelligence, or security services or personnel, and with which direct or indirect financial transactions would disproportionately benefit the Cuban military, intelligence, or security services or personnel at the expense of the Cuban people or private enterprise in Cuba. This list is called the Cuba Restricted List (CRL), and is available on the State Department's website at https://www.state.gov/division-for-counter-threat-finance-and-sanctions/cuba-restricted-list.  The Cuban Asset Control Regulations (CACR) prohibit any direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transaction with entities and subentities on the CRL. For a complete description of the scope of the prohibition on direct or indirect financial transactions and the restrictions and exceptions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.209. Please see FAQ 735 for additional information regarding a "direct financial transaction" and "indirect financial transaction." Please see FAQ 1271 for additional information on the effect of OFAC's September 30, 2026 amendment to the CACR on the CRL.  The prohibition on direct or indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities on the CRL applies to the following general licenses: §§ 515.530 (powers of attorney); 515.534 (contingent contracts); 515.545 (information/informational materials); 515.560 (travel-related transactions); 515.561 (family visits); 515.564 (professional research); 515.565 (educational activities); 515.566 (religious activities); 515.567 (public performances); 515.572 (travel services); 515.573 (physical and business presence in Cuba); 515.574 (support for the Cuban people); 515.576 (private foundations or research or educational institutes); 515.577 (publishing); 515.578 (internet-based services); 515.581 (conferences in third countries); 515.584 (certain financial transactions); and 515.590 (certain grants, scholarships, and awards). For a complete description of what each general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see the aforementioned general licenses.  The CACR also excludes from the scope of certain remittance-related general licenses any transactions relating to the collection, forwarding, or receipt of remittances involving any entity or subentity identified on the CRL. This restriction is distinct from the prohibition in § 515.209, which, for example, contains certain exceptions for pre-existing commercial engagements with CRL entities or subentities. See Note 2 to § 515.209, reinforcing this distinction. Specifically, OFAC excludes from the scope of certain general licenses any transaction relating to the collection, forwarding, or receipt of remittances involving any entity or subentity on the CRL, regardless of the existence of any pre-existing commercial engagements.  In addition, § 515.421 of the CACR contains an interpretive provision for incidental transactions where OFAC has clarified that authorized transactions ordinarily incident to licensed transactions and necessary to give effect thereto exclude direct and indirect financial transactions with such entities or subentities on the CRL if the terms of the applicable general or specific license expressly exclude such direct or indirect financial transactions. Section 515.421 also clarifies that a transaction relating to the collection, forwarding, or receipt of remittances involving any entity or subentity identified on the CRL is not authorized as an ordinarily incident transaction where the terms of the general or specific license expressly exclude any such transactions. For a complete description of the scope of the interpretive provision and the restrictions and exceptions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.421.  Finally, effective September 30, 2026, § 515.201(c) prohibits any transaction that has the purpose or effect of evading or avoiding the prohibitions on direct or indirect transactions with entities or subentities on the CRL.

724. Do travel service providers (such as travel agents and tour group operators) need to obtain specific licenses from OFAC to provide services for travel to Cuba?  No.  A general license authorizes persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction, including travel agents and tour group operators, to provide travel services in connection with authorized travel without the need for specific licenses from OFAC.  For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.572(a)(1). This general license excludes direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. This general license further excludes from the authorization lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba on the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List to the extent prohibited by § 515.210. For a complete description of the scope of this prohibition, see 31 CFR § 515.210. The provision of services related to travel for tourist activities or other unauthorized travel to Cuba remains prohibited. 

717. Are there any spending limits for authorized U.S. travelers while in Cuba?  There is no specific dollar limit on authorized expenses; however, the Cuban Assets Control Regulations restrict persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction from engaging in direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities or subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List, with certain exceptions. See 31 CFR §§ 515.209 and 515.421.  Consistent with these authorizations and restrictions, authorized travelers may engage in transactions ordinarily incident to travel within Cuba, including payment of living expenses and the acquisition in Cuba of goods for personal consumption there. 31 CFR § 515.421 also  excludes from the authorization lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba on the State Department’s Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List to the extent prohibited by 31 CFR § 515.210.  For a complete description of the scope of this prohibition, see 31 CFR § 515.210. In addition, travelers are authorized to acquire in Cuba and import as accompanied baggage into the United States merchandise for personal use only; this authorization excludes imports into the United States of Cuban-origin alcohol or tobacco products.  OFAC considers “personal use” of an imported item to include giving the item to another individual as a personal gift, but not the transfer of the item to another person for payment or other consideration. Value imports remain subject to the normal limits on duty and tax exemptions for merchandise imported as accompanied baggage and for personal use. 

710. What constitutes “exportation, importation, or transmission of information or informational materials” for generally authorized travel?  The general license at 31 CFR § 515.545(b)(1) authorizes, subject to conditions, travel-related transactions and other transactions that are directly incident to the exportation, importation, or transmission of information or informational materials.  This general license excludes from its authorization direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. This general license also excludes from the authorization lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba on the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List to the extent prohibited by § 515.210. For a complete description of the scope of this prohibition, see 31 CFR § 515.210.  The traveler’s schedule of activities must not include free time or recreation in excess of that consistent with a full- time schedule in Cuba. For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.545(b)(1).  The general license at 31 CFR §515.545(b)(2) authorizes, subject to conditions, travel-related transactions and other transactions that are directly incident to professional media or artistic productions of information or informational materials for exportation, importation, or transmission, including the filming or production of media programs (such as movies and television programs), the recording of music, and the creation of artworks in Cuba, provided that the traveler is regularly employed in or has demonstrated professional experience in a field relevant to such professional media or artistic productions. This general license excludes from the authorization direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List.  This general license also excludes from the authorization lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba on the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List to the extent prohibited by § 515.210.  For a complete description of the scope of this prohibition, see 31 CFR § 515.210.  The traveler’s schedule of activities must not include free time or recreation in excess of that consistent with a full-time schedule.  For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.545(b)(2).  The definition of “information and informational materials” may be found at 31 CFR § 515.332. 

709. What constitutes “activities of private foundations or research or educational institutes” for generally authorized travel?  Section 515.576 of the CACR contains a general license that authorizes, subject to conditions, travel-related transactions and other transactions that are directly incident to activities by private foundations or research or educational institutes with an established interest in international relations to collect information related to Cuba for noncommercial purposes, among other things.  This general license excludes direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. This general license also excludes lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba on the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List to the extent prohibited by § 515.210.  For a complete description of the scope of this prohibition, see 31 CFR § 515.210.  The traveler’s schedule of activities must not include free time or recreation in excess of that consistent with a full-time schedule in Cuba.  For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.576.  Additionally, 31 CFR § 515.573(d) authorizes private foundations or research or educational institutes engaging in transactions authorized by § 515.576 to establish a physical presence in Cuba, such as an office.  For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.573(a).

707. What constitutes “support for the Cuban people” for generally authorized travel and other transactions?  Section 515.574 of the CACR contains a general license that authorizes, subject to conditions, travel-related transactions and other transactions that are intended to provide support for the Cuban people, which include activities of recognized human rights organizations; independent organizations designed to promote a rapid, peaceful transition to democracy; and individuals and non-governmental organizations that promote independent activity intended to strengthen civil society in Cuba.  In accordance with NSPM-5 as issued June 16, 2017, OFAC amended this general license on November 8, 2017, to require that each traveler utilizing this authorization engage in a full-time schedule of activities that enhance contact with the Cuban people, support civil society in Cuba, or promote the Cuban people’s independence from Cuban authorities and that result in meaningful interactions with individuals in Cuba. This general license excludes direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. This general license also excludes lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba on the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List to the extent prohibited by § 515.210.  For a complete description of the scope of this prohibition, see 31 CFR § 515.210.  The traveler’s schedule of activities must not include free time or recreation in excess of that consistent with a full-time schedule in Cuba.  An entire group does not qualify for this general license merely because some members of the group qualify individually.  For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.574.

706. What constitutes generally authorized travel under the travel-related category of “public performances, clinics, workshops, athletic and other competitions, and exhibitions”?
  Section 515.567(a) of the CACR contains a general license that authorizes, subject to conditions, travel-related transactions and other transactions that are directly incident to organization of and participation in amateur and semi-professional international sports federation competitions.  Transactions incident to the organization of such competitions include marketing related to those specific events in Cuba.  OFAC will consider issuing specific licenses, on a case-by-case basis, for travel-related transactions and other transactions that are directly incident to participation in or organization of a public performance, clinic, workshop, athletic competition not covered by the general license in § 515.567(a), non-athletic competition, or exhibition in Cuba, subject to certain conditions.  OFAC excludes from this authorization direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the Cuba Restricted List.  OFAC also excludes from the authorization lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba on the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List to the extent prohibited by § 515.210.  For a complete description of the scope of this prohibition, see 31 CFR § 515.210.  For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.567.

705. Who is generally authorized to engage in travel-related transactions for “religious activities”?  Section 515.566 of the CACR contains a general license that authorizes, subject to conditions, travel-related transactions and other transactions that are directly incident to religious activities in Cuba.  All persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction, including religious organizations located in the United States and members and staff of such organizations, are generally authorized to engage in travel-related transactions that are directly incident to engaging in religious activities in Cuba provided, among other things, that the travel must be for the purpose of engaging in a program of religious activities.  This general license excludes direct and, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. This general license also excludes from the authorization lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba on the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List to the extent prohibited by § 515.210.  For a complete description of the scope of this prohibition, see 31 CFR § 515.210.  The traveler’s schedule of activities must not include free time or recreation in excess of that consistent with a full-time schedule in Cuba.  For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.566.

704. Can travelers engage in "people-to-people travel" to Cuba on an individual basis or as a part of a group?  No, persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction may not travel to Cuba to engage in "people-to-people" educational exchanges on an individual basis or, effective September 30, 2026, as part of a group.  However, § 515.565(c) includes a grandfathering provision, authorizing certain educational travel that was previously authorized under § 515.565(a). Specifically, travelers may still engage in group people-to-people travel for educational activities consistent with the authorization for educational travel (31 CFR § 515.565(b)) as the authorization existed on June 30, 2025 (when the 2026 NSPM-5 was issued) provided the traveler has already completed at least one travel-related transaction (such as purchasing a flight or reserving accommodation) prior to September 30, 2026. Any travel-related transactions under this grandfather provision, however, cannot involve either a direct or indirect financial transaction with entities or subentities on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. Please see FAQ 1274 for more information about how the September 30, 2026 amendment to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR) affected travel to Cuba for persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction.

702. What constitutes "educational activities" for generally authorized travel and other transactions?
  On September 30, 2026, OFAC amended 31 CFR § 515.565(a) to restore particular requirements for authorized educational activities related to Cuba. As of September 30, 2026, the requirements related to a person's use of the educational activities- authorization depend on whether the person engaging in the activity is associated with an accredited U.S. undergraduate or graduate degree-granting academic institution.  Effective September 30, 2026, § 515.565(a)(1) authorizes accredited U.S. undergraduate or graduate degree-granting academic institutions and their faculty, staff, and students, to engage in the travel-related transactions set forth in 31 CFR § 515.560(c) and such additional transactions as are directly incident to the six categories of educational activities enumerated in § 515.565(a)(1). Among other educational activities, this general license authorizes, subject to conditions outlined in § 515.565(a)(1), faculty, staff, and students at accredited U.S. undergraduate or graduate degree-granting academic institutions to participate in a structured educational program in Cuba or to teach at a Cuban academic institution, as well as authorizes Cuban scholars to engage in certain educational activities in the United States. For a complete description of authorized educational activities related to accredited U.S. undergraduate or graduate degree-granting academic institutions, and the restrictions that apply, see § 515.565(a)(1).  Effective September 30, 2026, § 515.565(a)(2) authorizes persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction, including, for example, U.S. secondary schools, to engage in additional educational activities that are not authorized under § 515.565(a)(1), provided that: (1) any travel-related transactions pursuant to these authorizations take place under the auspices of an organization that is a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction (the "sponsoring organization"), and (2) all travelers are accompanied by a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction who is an employee, paid consultant, agent, or other representative of the sponsoring organization (subject to certain exceptions). These authorized transactions include the travel-related transactions set forth in § 515.560(c) and such transactions as are directly incident to the 12 categories of educational activities enumerated in § 515.565(a)(2). For example, under this general license, U.S. and Cuban universities may engage in academic exchanges and joint non-commercial academic research, and persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction may provide standardized testing services and certain internet-based courses to Cuban nationals. For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see § 515.565(a)(2).  Effective September 30, 2026, OFAC further amended § 515.565 to remove the authorization for group people-to-people educational travel.  Please note that the general license at § 515.565 excludes any direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transaction with entities and subentities identified on the State Department's Cuba Restricted List. For a description of the scope of the prohibition on direct or indirect financial transactions and the restrictions and exceptions that apply, see § 515.209. This general license also excludes from the authorization lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba on the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List to the extent prohibited by § 515.210.

701. What constitutes generally authorized travel-related transactions for "professional research" in Cuba?  31 CFR § 515.564 (a)(1) contains a general license that authorizes, subject to conditions, travel-related transactions and other transactions that are directly incident to professional research in Cuba. Among other things, this general license authorizes, subject to conditions, professional research in Cuba relating to a traveler's profession, professional background, or area of expertise.  Effective September 30, 2026, OFAC amended § 515.564(a) to remove the previous license authorizing travel-related and other transactions incident to attendance at or organization of professional meetings or conferences in Cuba. However, specific licenses may be issued on a case-by-case basis for transactions related to such professional meetings. See FAQ 1275 for additional information on these changes.  Please note that § 515.564 excludes from its authorization lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba on the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List to the extent prohibited by § 515.210. For a complete description of the scope of this prohibition, see § 515.210. § 515.564 also excludes from its authorization any direct or indirect financial transaction with an entity or subentity identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. For a complete description of the scope of this prohibition, see § 515.209.  The traveler's schedule of activities must not include free time or recreation in excess of that consistent with a full-time schedule of professional research or a full-time schedule of attendance at, or organization of, professional meetings or conferences, respectively. An entire group does not qualify for the general license merely because some members of the group qualify individually. For a complete description of what these general licenses authorize and the restrictions that apply, see § 515.564.

699. What constitutes “a close relative” for generally authorized family travel?  OFAC regulations generally authorize persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction and those sharing a dwelling with them as a family to visit a close relative in Cuba, including a close relative who is a Cuban national or a person ordinarily resident in Cuba, or to visit or accompany a close relative who is located in or traveling to Cuba pursuant to the authorizations in § 515.562 (official government business), § 515.563 (journalistic activity), § 515.564(a) (professional research), § 515.565(a)(1)(i) through (iv) and (vi) (educational activities), § 515.566 (religious activities), § 515.575 (humanitarian projects), or § 515.576 (activities of private foundations or research or educational institutes). A close relative is defined as any individual related to a person “by blood, marriage, or adoption who is no more than three generations removed from that person or from a common ancestor with that person.” For a complete description of what this general license authorizes and the restrictions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.339 and § 515.561. The authorizations contained within § 515.561 exclude direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. For a description of the scope of the prohibition on direct or indirect financial transactions and the restrictions and exceptions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.209 or FAQ 735. 

696. Are authorized travelers who have initiated travel arrangements prior to the addition of an entity or subentity on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List required to cancel their Cuba-related travel plans if their travel arrangements involve direct or indirect financial transactions with a listed entity or subentity?  Any travel-related arrangements that include direct or indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities that appear on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List will continue to be permitted, provided that those travel arrangements were initiated prior to the State Department’s addition of the entity or subentity to the list. Once the State Department adds an entity or subentity to the Cuba Restricted List, new direct or, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with the entity or subentity are prohibited, unless authorized by OFAC or exempt. For a complete description of the scope of the prohibition on direct or indirect financial transactions and the restrictions and exceptions that apply, see 31 CFR § 515.209.

695. What are the general travel authorizations in the Cuba program?
  Travel-related transactions are permitted by general or specific licenses for certain travel related to the 12 categories of activities identified in 31 CFR § 515.560(a). Those travel-related transactions permitted by general license, subject to specified criteria and conditions, include: family visits; official business of the U.S. government, foreign governments, and certain intergovernmental organizations; journalistic activity; professional research and professional meetings; educational activities; religious activities; athletic competitions by amateur or semi-professional athletes or athletic teams; support for the Cuban people; humanitarian projects; activities of private foundations or research or educational institutes; exportation, importation, or transmission of information or information materials; and certain authorized export transactions. Each person relying on a certain general authorization must retain specific records related to the authorized travel transactions. See §§ 501.601 and 501.602 of the Reporting, Procedures and Penalties Regulations for applicable recordkeeping and reporting requirements.  Effective September 30, 2026, OFAC amended § 515.564(a) to remove the authorization for persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction to travel to Cuba for purposes of attending or organizing professional meetings or conferences in Cuba. OFAC also amended § 515.565 to reinstate certain restrictions on authorized academic educational activities to require certain educational travel to occur under the auspices of an organization subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and a representative of that sponsoring organization to accompany those travelers. Finally, OFAC removed the authorization for group people-to-people educational travel previously included in § 515.565. See FAQs 1274 and 1275 for more information on changes to travel-related authorizations under the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR).  Furthermore, the CACR includes a prohibition at § 515.209 that restricts certain direct and, effective September 30, 2026, indirect financial transactions with entities and subentities identified on the State Department's Cuba Restricted List (CRL). For a description of the scope of the prohibition on direct and indirect financial transactions with entities or subentities on the CRL, and the restrictions and exceptions that apply, see § 515.209.  Additionally, § 515.210 prohibits any person subject to U.S. jurisdiction from lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property that the Secretary of State has identified as a property in Cuba that is owned or controlled by: the Cuban government; a prohibited official of the Government of Cuba, as defined in § 515.337; a prohibited member of the Cuban Communist Party, as defined in § 515.338; a close relative, as defined in § 515.339, of a prohibited official of the Government of Cuba, or a close relative of a prohibited member of the Cuban Communist Party, when the terms of the general or specific license expressly exclude such a transaction. The State Department maintains the Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List, which identifies the names, addresses, or other identifying details, as relevant, of properties identified as meeting such criteria.

U.S. Secretary Of State Rubio About Cuba: "preference of our President is to solve these things diplomatically"

Fox News
New York, New York
28 September 2026


Marco Rubio, United States Secretary of State

QUESTION:  Is Cuba about to fall, and can you update us on Venezuela?

SECRETARY RUBIO:  Well, the truth is Cuba has already fallen.  It’s not – it doesn’t have a functional economy and it’s governed by people who continue to preach about some revolution that has been dead for 20 years that’s never worked.  And that’s the problem they have.  The problem that Cuba has basically right now is that it is a failed state in every sense of the word.  Now, they may have a government that’s capable of jailing and killing people.  They have a regime that’s capable of and has jailed and killed people.  But it’s not a functional government and it’s not a functional country.  It just simply isn’t.

And in addition to that, it’s one that’s fueled by corruption, graft, and theft.  The Cuban economy – there is no Cuban economy that benefits the Cuban people.  Anything that had a chance of making money in Cuba was controlled by the Cuban military and the Cuban Communist Party to line the pockets of a handful of individuals at the expense of the entire country.  You know that since 2021 at least close to 20 percent of Cuba’s population has left the country?  Has left it because it’s a failure, a complete failure.

So we are hopeful that Cuba will choose a different path.  We are hopeful that the people that today sort of control the arms and the repressive regime, that there will be some people in there that open their eyes to the reality of what they’re facing.  What they’re no longer going to do as long as Donald Trump is President is they’re no longer going to be able to steal money and make money off the backs of the Cuban people.  And what we’re not going to allow ever under any circumstances as long as President Trump is President is we’re never going to allow Cuba to become a base of operation against American interests or pose a threat to our national security.  On that we are abundantly clear.

As in every case – you can ask about any country or any problem in the world, and I will tell you that the preference of our President is to solve these things diplomatically and in a way that you can reach an agreement and get Cuba or any country on a path to irreversible, positive change that involves economic freedoms but also involves political freedoms.  In fact, you cannot have economic freedom in Cuba if you don’t have political freedom first.  You have to have both happening at least at the same time.  That will require a period of transition.  Unfortunately, the people that continue there to chant revolutionary slogans – too many of them – still believe that they could wait out this administration and make no changes or do nothing.  They are wrong and they will learn the lesson the hard way if they don’t correct.

Cuba Government "wouldn't discard" Mediator. Resurrect Idea During Trump-Pence Administration In 2016? Calling (Again) Kenneth Feinberg.

Carlos Fernández de Cossío, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cuba (2022- ), shared the following three observations during an interview on 25 September 2026 with Bloomberg during the 81st United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in New York City, New York. 

  • “If the US eases the amount of pressure, then those transformations in Cuba can go a long way and become truly irreversible, which is our aim and in theory is what the US wants to happen.” 

  • “The resources in Cuba belong to the people of Cuba.  Our government does not have the right to deprive them of that and hand it over to another country.” 

Link: DOD (War) OSC Could Be U.S. Taxpayer Partner Of Last Resort For Canada’s Sherritt And Australia’s Antilles. Cobalt, Copper, Gold, Nickel, Silver Are Strategic Minerals. August 30, 2026 

Link: Cuba: And Now There Are Two…  Antilles Gold Has Until 25 January 2027 And Sherritt International Has Until 12 October 2026 August 27, 2026 

Link: Potential Triple Play? Carney, Diaz-Canel, Trump Deal. U.S. Secretary Of Defense Hegseth Wants Cobalt. Cuba Has It. Settling One Libertad Act Issue. And Opening Doors? August 23, 2025

  • Third-party mediator: “wouldn't discard it… It’s not that we need someone to put us together in a specific place.” 

Link: The Negotiator-in-Chief For Cuba: We’re Grown-Ups- Let’s Make A Deal; Calling Mr. Kenneth Feinberg December 01, 2016 

new york times

There are 8,821 claims of which 5,913 awards valued at US$1,902,202,284.95 were certified by the United States Foreign Claims Settlement Commission (USFCSC) and have not been resolved for nearing sixty years (some assets were officially confiscated in the 1960’s, some in the 1970’s and some in the 1990’s).  The USFCSC permitted simple interest (not compound interest) of 6% per annum (approximately US$114,132,137.10); with the approximate current value of the 5,913 certified claims is approximately US$9.4 billion.  

The first asset (along with 382 enterprises the same day) to be expropriated by the Republic of Cuba was an oil refinery on 6 August 1960 owned by White Plains, New York-based Texaco, Inc., now a subsidiary of San Ramon, California-based Chevron Corporation (USFCSC: CU-1331/CU-1332/CU-1333 valued at US$56,196,422.73).  

From the certified claim filed by Texaco: “The Cuban corporation was intervened on June 29, 1960, pursuant to Resolution 188 of June 28, 1960, under Law 635 of 1959.  Resolution 188 was promulgated by the Government of Cuba when the Cuban corporation assertedly refused to refine certain crude oil as assertedly provided under a 1938 law pertaining to combustible materials.  Subsequently, this Cuban firm was listed as nationalized in Resolution 19 of August 6, 1960, pursuant to Cuban Law 851.  The Commission finds, however, that the Cuban corporation was effectively intervened within the meaning of Title V of the Act by the Government of Cuba on June 29, 1960.” 

The largest certified claim (Cuban Electric Company) valued at US$267,568,413.62 is controlled by Boca Raton, Florida-based Office Depot, Inc.  The second-largest certified claim (International Telephone and Telegraph Co, ITT as Trustee, Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.) valued at US$181,808,794.14 is controlled by Bethesda, Maryland-based Marriott International; the certified claim also includes land adjacent to the Jose Marti International Airport in Havana, Republic of Cuba.  The third-largest certified claim valued at US$97,373,414.72 is controlled by New York, New York-based North American Sugar Industries, Inc.  The smallest certified claim is by Sara W. Fishman in the amount of US$1.00 with reference to the Cuban-Venezuelan Oil Voting Trust. 

The two (2) largest certified claims total US$449,377,207.76, representing 24% of the total value of the certified claims.  Thirty (30) certified claimants hold 56% of the total value of the certified claims.  This concentration of value creates an efficient pathway towards a settlement. 

Links To Related Analyses

Troika To Negotiate Settlement Of Certified Claims Against Cuba? Kushner, Greenblatt & Feinberg December 11, 2018 

Background Interview With Trump Administration Officials April 08, 2019 

Is It Time For President Trump To Appoint A Special Representative For Cuba? February 12, 2020

President Biden: A Special Presidential Representative For Cuba Negotiations- With Or Without An Ambassador January 31, 2021

Cuba Could Resolve Western Union's Certified Claim By Waiving Four Months Of Electronic Remittance Transfer Fees. Biden Administration Should Support And Negotiate Certified Claims Settlement. September 17, 2021 

bloomberg

President Trump: "We want to open Cuba to our people."

The White House
Washington DC
26 September 2026


"Cuba and us will make a deal. I don't think we'll need the military.  Cuba is failing very badly. We want to help Cuba.  We want to open Cuba up to our people.  We have great Cuban Americans who want to go back.  We want to open Cuba up to our people."  Donald Trump, President of the United States (2017-2021 and 2025-2029) 

Benjamin Franklin Not Always Welcome In Cuba And Russia. Depends Upon His Appearance. Challenge Using US$100.00 Bill.

Benjamin Franklin Not Always Welcome In Cuba And Russia

Depends Upon His Appearance

Challenge Using US$100.00 Bill  

A visitor to the Russian Federation is required to use the Ruble for transactions- whether electronically through a credit card or debit card or through currency. 

When visiting a financial institution in the Russian Federation, particularly in the capital, Moscow, and second-largest city, St. Petersburg, bank branches and currency exchange companies require that United States currency be near mint condition- no creases, no markings, no printing irregularities (faded, etc.), no tears. 

Some bank branches and currency exchange companies may accept “damaged banknotes” although with an additional fifteen percent (15%) commission. 

There are prohibitions on exchanging United States currency which were printed in certain years and for some years, currency is accepted with an additional five percent (5%) commission.  For example, 1996, 1999, 2001, 2003, and 2006.  The acceptable years change absent advance notification.  

There are also prohibitions on exchanging United States currency which have certain letters next to the year.  The acceptable letters change absent advance notification.  

  • For example: “When the Bureau of Engraving and Printing makes a change to a bill—such as a new Treasurer or Secretary of the Treasury taking office, or a minor production shift—they add a letter (like A, B, etc.) to the base series year.” 

  • For example: “A plain Series 2006 bill has the base year design and signatures, while Series 2006A means a slight change (such as new signatures) occurred while keeping the core 2006 appearance.” 

  • For example: “On U.S. paper currency, "Series 2007 C" means the bill was printed under a design whose base year was 2007, and the C suffix indicates a minor modification—specifically, a change in one or both of the official signatures (the Treasurer of the United States and the Secretary of the Treasury) or a minor plate/production adjustment without a complete redesign.” 

CiberCuba
24 September 2026
 

MIPYME rejects US$100.00 bill for being folded, and a Cuban denounces the situation on social media. 

A Cuban identified as Camilo Velazco Montero reported on social media that a small and medium-sized enterprise refused to accept a US$100.00 bill because, as he explained, it was crumpled.  In a video posted on Facebook, Velazco displayed the bill in front of the camera and questioned the decision of the private business. 

"Because it's folded. It's not broken, it's not dirty, it's not fake. It's folded. The small and medium enterprises don't want to accept the money because it's folded," he stated.  The man pointed out that bills often get folded when stored in wallets or pockets and considered it exaggerated that some establishments require cash in almost perfect condition.  With an ironic tone, he recommended that businesses in need of "smooth" bills go directly to the Mint to obtain them freshly printed.  "If you need cash, please go to the Mint and get it at the Mint," he said. 

The post generated numerous reactions from users who claimed to have experienced similar situations with both private and state-run establishments.  "Not only in the micro, small, and medium enterprises, but also in state-owned stores," commented a user.  Another responded humorously: "You're outdated; you need to laminate it and soon you'll need to frame it." 

Some users tried to explain the practice by pointing out that certain businesses seek to receive bills in good condition because they later have to use them for payments, bank deposits, or purchases abroad, where there may also be restrictions on the physical condition of cash.  The rejection of banknotes due to their physical condition is not a new phenomenon in Cuba.  In November 2025, while in 2026 reports emerged about businesses refusing certain denominations of Cuban pesos.  In light of these situations, the Central Bank of Cuba warned that no establishment may arbitrarily decide which denominations it will accept. 

The debate occurs against the backdrop of a growing dependence on cash in the Cuban economy. The U.S. dollar recently hit record values in the informal market, while difficulties with electronic payments have kept physical money as a crucial tool for many transactions.  In mid-September, the Cuban government approved new regulations that allow micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (mipymes) and other private actors to receive cash in foreign currency and deposit it into bank accounts in foreign currency, a measure that has increased the significance of handling dollars within everyday economics.

LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT

Today: United Kingdom's FCDO "advises against all but essential travel to Cuba"

Foreign Travel Advice- Cuba
FCDO advises against all but essential travel to Cuba.

Warnings and insurance

Still current at: 25 September 2026 
Updated: 25 September 2026
 

Latest update:

This travel advice has been reviewed for accuracy with changes made throughout, including protests in Cuba, power outages and fuel and water shortages, travel disruption, international card transactions, travel insurance, visa requirements, travelling to the USA from Cuba, taking money into Cuba, crime, money, taxis, emergency medical numbers and healthcare in Cuba (‘Warnings and insurance’, ‘Entry requirements’, ‘Safety and security’ and ‘Health’ pages). 

Protests in Cuba

Cuba is experiencing a worsening economic situation with shortages of fuel, electricity, water and basic necessities. This is affecting tourism services and disrupting travel within the country.  The situation has led to frequent protests. To date most of these have remained peaceful but be aware that protests can escalate. You should stay away from large gatherings, monitor the media for updates and follow the advice of the local authorities.  The situation is also leading to an increase in opportunistic crime, but levels remain lower than in the UK. See ‘Crime’ on the Safety and security page.  

Power outages and fuel and water shortages

The Cuban National Electric grid has collapsed a number of times over the last few months. Given current circumstances, further grid collapses are likely. Low fuel reserves are leading to severe and sustained disruption to essential infrastructure and basic services, including transport, medical care, communications, water supply and street lighting. Authorities have introduced fuel rationing, scaled back public services, and made changes to healthcare, education, transport and tourism operations to conserve severely limited energy supplies. Access to safe drinking water and wastewater management can be problematic.  Take precautions by conserving fuel, water, food and mobile phone charge, and be prepared for significant disruption.

Travel disruption 

Cuban authorities have announced that all of its international airports are without aviation fuel. Only Terminal 3 at José Martí International Airport is currently in operation. Some airlines, including all Canadian airlines, Air France, Iberia, World2Fly and LATAM, have suspended flights to and from Cuba. Other airlines are keeping their routes under review. Options for leaving the country could reduce further if the situation worsens.  If you are currently in Cuba, carefully consider if your presence is essential. The situation has the potential to deteriorate quickly and without warning. Make sure you are ready to change your plans quickly if needed. If you are considering leaving Cuba, check for messaging from your airline or tour operator for up-to-date information. Ensure your travel documents remain valid and confirm you have any required visas for onward travel.  Continue to monitor local media and follow the instructions of local authorities. Subscribe to FCDO email alerts and read our guidance on how to deal with a crisis overseas. 

International card transactions

The Cuban Central Bank has announced that international cards such as Visa and Mastercard are no longer accepted in Cuba. Available payment methods include cash and Cuban prepaid cards. You will not be able to withdraw cash through ATMs with an international card.  If you need to visit Cuba, you should bring enough cash to cover your expenses for the entire length of your stay and in case of an emergency (such as medical treatment or delayed departure). US dollars and euros are widely accepted and can be exchanged in Cuba. See ‘Money’ on the Safety and security page.

Update For Use Of In Cuba Of USDA MAP And FMD Programs Authorized Since 2018 

Update For Use Of In Cuba Of USDA MAP And FMD Programs Authorized Since 2018 

In 2018, legislative advocates for issues relating to the Republic of Cuba maintained that inserting into the Farm Bill authorization for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to include Market Access Program (MAP) and Foreign Market Development (FMD) for the Republic of Cuba was critical to “laying the groundwork” for increasing exports of agricultural commodities and food products to the Republic of Cuba. 

Statements from members of the United States Congress included: “… an important first step to regaining our presence in Cuba.”    

During the last eight years, use to date of USDA MAP/FMD Republic of Cuba-focused funding provisions in the Farm Bill remains anemic.   

For FMD, the program years for all groups run as follows:
FMD PY 2026: January 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027
FMD PY 2027: January 1, 2027 to June 30, 2028
 
For MAP, recipients can be on one of two possible program year cycles with different beginning and ending dates:
MAP PY 2026 begins either January 1, 2026 or July 1, 2026 and ends June 30, 2027 or December 31, 2027, respectively
MAP PY 2027 begins either January 1, 2027 or July 1, 2027 and ends June 30, 2028 or December 31, 2028, respectively

What Is FMD & MAP?  

The USDA does not provide any payments to selected applicants in advance of the applicant making disbursements. The USDA provides payment upon receipt of an invoice from the applicant. The invoices are audited by the USDA and a claw back of payments is permitted.  

MAP: “Through the Market Access Program (MAP), FAS partners with U.S. agricultural trade associations, cooperatives, state regional trade groups and small businesses to share the costs of overseas marketing and promotional activities that help build commercial export markets for U.S. agricultural products and commodities.”   

“MAP reaches virtually every corner of the globe, helping to build markets for a wide variety U.S. farm and food products. FAS provides cost-share assistance to eligible U.S. organizations for activities such as consumer advertising, public relations, point-of-sale demonstrations, participation in trade fairs and exhibits, market research and technical assistance. When MAP funds are used for generic marketing and promotion, participants must contribute a minimum 10-percent match. For promotion of branded products, a dollar-for-dollar match is required. Each year, FAS announces the MAP application period and criteria in the Federal Register. Applicants apply for MAP through the Unified Export Strategy (UES) process, which allows eligible organizations to request funding from multiple USDA market development programs through a single, strategically coordinated proposal. FAS reviews the proposals and awards funds to applicants that demonstrate the potential for effective performance based on a clear, long-term strategic plan.”   

FMD: “The Foreign Market Development (FMD) Program, also known as the Cooperator Program, helps create, expand and maintain long-term export markets for U.S. agricultural products. Under the program, FAS partners with U.S. agricultural producers and processors, who are represented by non-profit commodity or trade associations called “cooperators,” to promote U.S. commodities overseas.”   

“The FMD program focuses on generic promotion of U.S. commodities, rather than consumer-oriented promotion of branded products. Preference is given to organizations that represent an entire industry or are nationwide in membership and scope.   

FMD-funded projects generally address long-term opportunities to reduce foreign import constraints or expand export growth opportunities. For example, this might include efforts to: reduce infrastructural or historical market impediments, improve processing capabilities, modify codes and standards, or identify new markets or new uses for the agricultural commodity or product.   

Each year, FAS announces the FMD application period and criteria in the Federal Register. Organizations apply for the FMD program through the Unified Export Strategy (UES) process, which allows applicants to request funding from multiple USDA market development programs through a single, strategically coordinated proposal. FAS reviews the proposals and awards funds to applicants that demonstrate the potential for effective performance based on a clear, long-term strategic plan.”   

Links To Related Analyses 

Defining Anemic: In Five Years, 2018 Farm Bill USDA Provision For Cuba Had No Use Of FMD And Two Uses Of MAP. Approximately 90 U.S.-Based Entities Could Have Participated. That’s A 2.2% Use Rate. February 03, 2023 

USDA Updates Usage In Cuba Of MAP And FMD Funding Authorized By 2018 Farm Bill. In Four Funding Periods In Four Years, Two Uses Of MAP; No Uses Of FMD. Anemic Response By Export Advocates. November 11, 2021 

After Nearing 700 Days Since Farm Bill Authorized Use Of USDA FMD/MAP Funding In Cuba, 1st Request Is Reported- For Potatoes December 24, 2020

LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT

Saving Antilles Gold: Will GEM Global Yield LLC SCS Obtain OFAC, BIS, Department Of State Authorizations?

27 August 2026  

BINDING MoU SIGNED TO INITIATE POSSIBLE LIFTING OF US SANCTION OF CUBAN JOINT VENTURE COMPANY  

Antilles Gold Limited (“Antilles Gold” or the “Company”) (ASX: AAU) is pleased to advise that on 25 August 2026 the Company signed a binding Memorandum of Understanding ("MoU") with GEM Global Yield LLC SCS ("GEM") whereby GEM is expected to become a 25% shareholder in the Company’s Cayman Islands registered subsidiary, Antilles Gold Inc (“AGI”), which holds 50% of Cuban joint venture mining company, Minera La Victoria (“MLV”).  

GEM will assist in making representations and commitments to the U.S. Department of State (“DoS”) in an endeavour to lift the sanction recently imposed by DoS on MLV, so that the suspended construction of its Nueva Sabana gold-copper mine can resume. GEM Global Yield LLC SCS is an entity registered in Luxembourg, and 100% owned by U.S. citizens, including New York based directors (refer “About GEM” below).  

Refer ASX announcements dated 10, 18, and 24 June, and 7 July 2026 for a chronology of this matter. The primary terms of the MoU are as follows:   

GEM will promptly approach DoS to advise the intentions of the Parties and to seek permission for GEM and the various stakeholders, including MLV, to negotiate the commercial arrangements and commitments to DoS that could result in DoS lifting the sanction, and MLV being licenced by the U.S. Department of Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC") to transact with U.S. entities and person.  

GEM will commit to DoS that, subject to the completion of satisfactory due diligence and the lifting of the sanction, it will incorporate a new subsidiary in the U.S. which will subscribe for a 25% shareholding in AGI as the first step towards a minimum of 51% of AGI’s shares being held by U.S. entities.   

GEM will complete its due diligence within 60 days. • AGL and GEM will commit to DoS that, subject to the sanction being lifted, AGI will place sufficient of its shares to U.S. investors to achieve a minimum of 51% being held by U.S. entities, by no later than 30 June 2028.  

AGL and GEM recognise that by early 2028, with the Nueva Sabana mine expected to be operating profitably and the La Demajagua gold-silver antimony mine being construction-ready after completion of its Definitive Feasibility Study ("DFS"), the AGI shares to be placed should be attractive for U.S. investors.  

AGI will commit to DoS that: − its Board will be reconstituted if the sanction is lifted and GEM’s subsidiary becomes a minority shareholder, by the appointment of a U.S. citizen as the independent Chairperson, two U.S. citizens nominated by GEM being appointed as non-executive directors, and AGL nominating one non-executive director and one executive director, and − the surplus cash generated from the first two years of operation of the Nueva Sabana mine will be retained as equity for the La Demajagua mine rather than being distributed as dividends.

AGL and GEM will commit to DoS that they will negotiate in good faith, the terms of a Shareholders Agreement within 90 days of the date of the MoU, which will be formalised concurrently with GEM’s subsidiary becoming a shareholder of AGI, and will: − establish the conduct of AGI and reinforce the agreed commitments to DoS, and − recognise the intention of AGI to apply the US$18.0M of capital received from GEM’s subsidiary to a short-term loan to MLV for financing the construction of the Nueva Sabana mine (US$12.0M), and to meet the cost of the Definitive Feasibility Study (“DFS”) for the La Demajagua gold-silver-antimony mine (US$4.0M), with the balance (US$2.0M) available for working capital, and − confirm AGI’s intention to continue its current initiative to purchase the Cuban partner’s 50% shareholding in MLV, and − include a provision for the preferential sale to U.S. buyers of strategic metal in the form of antimony cathodes, that will be produced by the La Demajagua mine.   

The Term of the MoU is for six months from the date of the MoU, unless extended by mutual agreement. The MoU will also terminate: − if GEM has not engaged with DoS within 15 days of the signing of the MoU, or − if GEM is not satisfied by its due diligence within 60 Days of the signing of the MoU, or − at AGL’s option, if DoS does not engage positively with GEM within 60 days of the date of the MoU with respect to the prospect of lifting the sanction, or − at AGL’s option, if the terms of the Shareholders Agreement have not been agreed within 90 days of the date of the MoU.  

The Chairman of Antilles Gold, Mr Brian Johnson, commented “shareholders will appreciate that though the proposed transaction with GEM would result in the Company’s shareholding in AGI being reduced, it will not reduce the value of its shares in AGI because of the 33% increase in the capital which is expected to be subscribed by GEM’s subsidiary.  

Based on the subscription price for 25% of AGI’s shares, the residual 75% held by the Company would be valued at ~A$75M 

Based on the positive dealings with GEM to date, and their understanding of the commercial potential of MLV and the Cuban mining sector in general, it is anticipated that GEM’s partnering with Antilles Gold in the Cuban projects would be rewarding for all stakeholders, however, it must be emphasised that there is no certainty as to the outcome of negotiations with GEM or DoS. Shareholders will be kept informed of any developments on this matter in accordance with the Company’s continuous disclosure obligations.”  

About GEM Global Emerging Markets ("GEM") is a $3.4 billion, alternative investment group with offices in Paris, New York, and Nassau (Bahamas). GEM manages a diverse set of investment vehicles focused on emerging markets and has completed over 600 transactions in 75 countries. Each investment vehicle has a different degree of operational control, risk-adjusted return, and liquidity profile. The family of funds and investment vehicles provide GEM and its partners with exposure to: Small-Mid Cap Management Buyouts, Private Investments in Public Equities and select venture investments. For more information: http://www.gemny.com 

Link To Media Release

Links To Related Analysis 

Might Trump Administration Focus On Sourcing Copper Lead To Approval Of U.S. Investor Control Of Copper, Gold, And Silver Operations Of Australia Company? September 11, 2026  

DOD (War) OSC Could Be U.S. Taxpayer Partner Of Last Resort For Canada’s Sherritt And Australia’s Antilles. Cobalt, Copper, Gold, Nickel, Silver Are Strategic Minerals. August 30, 2026 

Cuba: And Now There Are Two…  Antilles Gold Has Until 25 January 2027 And Sherritt International Has Until 12 October 2026 August 27, 2026 

Can Antilles Gold Of Australia Convince The Trump-Vance Administration And Government Of Cuba To Restructure Company Operations And Assets In Cuba?  July 31, 2026